29.08.2014 Views

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ons aimed at satellites. 17 Clearly, despite his reformist<br />

rhetoric, on strategic nuclear matters Gorbachev<br />

continued to abide by the concept of MAD <strong>and</strong> the<br />

traditional Soviet position on the offensive-defensive<br />

linkage.<br />

Gorbachev’s proposals were specifically aimed<br />

against the U.S. <strong>Strategic</strong> Defense Initiative (SDI) announced<br />

by the Ronald Reagan administration in January<br />

1984. Together with American counterproposals,<br />

they were discussed at the Geneva, Switzerl<strong>and</strong> (November<br />

1985) <strong>and</strong> Reykjavik, Icel<strong>and</strong> (October 1986)<br />

bilateral summits. In negotiations, while Gorbachev<br />

agreed in principle with Reagan’s proposal to reduce<br />

by half the numbers of strategic offensive weapons,<br />

he also emphasized that this would not be possible if<br />

the United States went ahead with creating a strategic<br />

defense shield. He argued that in this case, the Soviet<br />

Union would have to concentrate on developing<br />

its strategic strike capacity in order to neutralize the<br />

“space shield.” 18<br />

In effect, Gorbachev was the first to offer the antiballistic<br />

missile defense (BMD) rationalization that<br />

is currently used by leaders of the RF. For example,<br />

he doubted the American suggestion to share ABM<br />

technology with the Soviet Union once it was ready<br />

for use. He told the Americans that “the creation of<br />

a shield . . . would allow a first strike without retaliation.”<br />

He also said that the Soviet Union had already<br />

developed a response to SDI that would be “effective,<br />

far less expensive <strong>and</strong> ready for use in less time.” 19 In<br />

still another effort to reconfirm the rigid linkage of<br />

strategic offensive <strong>and</strong> defense weapons, Gorbachev<br />

declared that the SDI stood in the way of a 50 percent<br />

cut in strategic arms <strong>and</strong> insisted that the U.S. administration<br />

should do something about it if the administration<br />

wanted to reduce the nuclear stockpiles. 20<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!