29.08.2014 Views

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2010 AND INTO THE FUTURE<br />

The new, third <strong>Russian</strong> Military Doctrine, which<br />

ushered in yet another turn in the role of nuclear<br />

weapons, was revealed in February 2010. 23 Work on<br />

that document was launched by a special conference<br />

convened at the <strong>Russian</strong> Academy of Military Sciences<br />

in January 2007. Speakers at that meeting, including<br />

then-Chief of General Staff Yuri Baluyevskii, agreed<br />

that nuclear weapons would still play a central role in<br />

Russia’s security, but the overall tone suggested that<br />

the nuclear component of the 2000 Doctrine would<br />

remain unchanged; attention focused instead on the<br />

upcoming reforms <strong>and</strong> modernization of general-purpose<br />

forces. 24<br />

Quite unexpectedly, however, the nuclear section<br />

of the draft became a contested issue in the months<br />

preceding its release <strong>and</strong> was perhaps one of the reasons<br />

for multiple delays (it was initially scheduled to<br />

be released in the fall of 2009). In an interview in October<br />

2009, Secretary of the Security Council Nikolai<br />

Patrushev indicated that the future document might<br />

assign nuclear weapons to yet one more type of war—<br />

”local conflicts.” 25 This would have represented a<br />

massive expansion of the role of nuclear weapons:<br />

whereas the 1993 Doctrine assigned them to “global<br />

wars,” <strong>and</strong> the 2000 one added “regional wars,” the<br />

further expansion described by Patrushev would have<br />

assigned them to conflicts similar to the 2008 war with<br />

Georgia.<br />

In the end, however, the trend set by the new<br />

Doctrine was opposite to what Patrushev described.<br />

Instead of further exp<strong>and</strong>ing the role of nuclear weapons,<br />

it somewhat reduced it by tightening conditions<br />

209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!