29.08.2014 Views

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

it endangers the <strong>Russian</strong> state (a provision not in the<br />

first 1993 doctrine).<br />

In both documents, the declared purpose of <strong>Russian</strong><br />

nuclear weapons is to deter other countries from<br />

engaging in a military conflict with Russia. Like the<br />

United States <strong>and</strong> the other declared nuclear weapons<br />

states, with the notable exception of China, the <strong>Russian</strong><br />

Government has refused since the release of its<br />

November 1993 Military Doctrine to declare in public<br />

its adherence to an unqualified no nuclear-first-use<br />

posture. 18 In principle, <strong>Russian</strong> officials are prepared<br />

to start a nuclear war in an emergency. These declaratory<br />

statements still appear operationally relevant,<br />

since <strong>Russian</strong> military forces continue to conduct<br />

large-scale exercises with scenarios involving possible<br />

nuclear use—though these seem to involve longerrange<br />

strategic systems rather than tactical nuclear<br />

weapons. 19<br />

Despite expectations based on earlier statements<br />

by the <strong>Russian</strong> Government, the 2010 doctrine does<br />

not exp<strong>and</strong> the range of permissible uses of nuclear<br />

weapons to include preventive or preemptive nuclear<br />

strikes or explicitly affirm Russia’s right to employ<br />

nuclear weapons for regional <strong>and</strong> even local wars<br />

against terrorists. Such an expansive posture was offered<br />

in several apparent trial balloon statements by<br />

senior <strong>Russian</strong> military <strong>and</strong> security policymakers in<br />

the years before the 2010 Military Doctrine was published,<br />

including General Yuri Baluyevsky, head of<br />

the <strong>Russian</strong> General Staff <strong>and</strong> First Deputy Defense<br />

Minister. 20 Likewise, Security Council Secretary Nikolai<br />

Patrushev made the following statement to the Rossiyskaya<br />

Gazeta concerning the draft of the new Military<br />

Doctrine then under consideration: “The conduct<br />

of a nuclear strike against an aggressor, including a<br />

376

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!