29.08.2014 Views

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44. See George Perkovich, “After Prague: What’s Next<br />

for Arms Control?” International Herald Tribune, April 7, 2010,<br />

available from www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.<br />

cfm?fa=view&id=40532.<br />

45. On Iran’s progress toward the capability for nuclear weaponization<br />

<strong>and</strong> related issues, see Iran’s <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>and</strong> Missile Potential:<br />

A Joint Threat Assessment by U.S. <strong>and</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> Technical Experts,<br />

New York: East-West Institute, May 2009, available from www.<br />

ewi.info; <strong>and</strong> “Iran’s <strong>Nuclear</strong> Timetable,” Iran Watch, updated February<br />

23, 2010, <strong>and</strong> regularly, available from www.iranwatch.org/<br />

ourpubs/articles/iranucleartimetable.html. For possible scenarios if<br />

diplomacy fails, see Anthony Cordesman, Iran, Israel <strong>and</strong> the Effects<br />

of a <strong>Nuclear</strong> Conflict in the Middle East, Washington, DC: Center<br />

for <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>and</strong> International Studies, June 1, 2009, esp. pp.<br />

5-8 <strong>and</strong> 32-46. On North Korea, see Leon V. Sigal, “Let’s Make<br />

a Deal,” The American Interest Magazine, January-February 2010,<br />

available from the-american-interest.com/article-bd.cfm?piece=767;<br />

<strong>and</strong> Andrew Scobell <strong>and</strong> John M. Sanford, North Korea’s Military<br />

Threat: Pyongyang’s Conventional Forces, <strong>Weapons</strong> of Mass Destruction,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Ballistic Missiles, Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College,<br />

<strong>Strategic</strong> Studies Institute, April 2007.<br />

46. Henry Sokolski, “Moving Toward Zero <strong>and</strong> Armageddon?”<br />

Chap. 5, in Sokolski, ed., Reviewing the <strong>Nuclear</strong> Nonproliferation<br />

Treaty, Carlisle, PA: <strong>Strategic</strong> Studies Institute, U.S. Army<br />

War College, May 2010, pp. 77-101, citation from p. 87.<br />

47. For possible dangers <strong>and</strong> pathways to nuclear first use, see<br />

George H. Quester, <strong>Nuclear</strong> First Strike: Consequences of a Broken<br />

Taboo, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006. On<br />

the concept of a nuclear taboo, see Nina Tannenwald, The <strong>Nuclear</strong><br />

Taboo: The United States <strong>and</strong> the Non-Use of <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Weapons</strong> Since<br />

1945, Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007, esp. pp.<br />

327-360.<br />

48. See Graham Allison, <strong>Nuclear</strong> Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable<br />

Catastrophe, New York: Henry Holt, Times Books, 2004,<br />

pp. 61-63.<br />

49. For informative discussion on this point, see Blank, Russia<br />

<strong>and</strong> Arms Control; <strong>and</strong> Joseph Cirincione, Bomb Scare: The History<br />

456

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!