29.08.2014 Views

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future - Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62. See Amy F. Woolf, “Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty Demarcation<br />

<strong>and</strong> Succession Agreements: Background <strong>and</strong> Issues,” CRS<br />

Report to Congress, April 27, 2000, available from www.cnie.org/nle/<br />

crsreports/international/inter-68.cfm.<br />

63. Putin’s short statement in response to the American withdrawal<br />

announcement made the following points: “The U.S. has<br />

the legitimate right to ab<strong>and</strong>on the Treaty in accordance with its<br />

provisions; though an American ‘mistake’ the withdrawal decision<br />

does not create immediate threats to <strong>Russian</strong> security; ab<strong>and</strong>onment<br />

of the ABM Treaty leads to the emergence of a legal<br />

vacuum in the elaborate system of agreements in the sphere of<br />

disarmament <strong>and</strong> the nonproliferation; that ‘vacuum’ should be<br />

filled up by rapid elaboration of a ‘new framework’ of strategic<br />

mutual relations; under that ‘framework’ considerable reductions<br />

of offensive weapons should take place (preferably to the level of<br />

1,500-2,200 warheads for each side).” See Vadim Markushin, “Bad<br />

News for the World Community,” Krasnaya Zvezda, December 15,<br />

2001, in <strong>Russian</strong>.<br />

64. Menshikov.<br />

65. “<strong>Russian</strong> Reaction to NATO’s Enlargement,” Analitik,<br />

March 4, 2004, in <strong>Russian</strong>, available from analitik.org.ua/ukr/current-comment/ext/407412da4f691/pagedoc1095_25/.<br />

66. “The SOR Treaty calls for the reduction of the strategic nuclear<br />

warheads of both Russia <strong>and</strong> the United States by the end of<br />

2012 to 1,700-2,200, i.e., approximately by three times compared<br />

to the level provided by the START 1 Treaty. START 1 itself is<br />

to remain in force until December 5, 2009, <strong>and</strong> may then be extended.<br />

The SOR Treaty ensures continuity in disarmament <strong>and</strong><br />

arms control in the conditions when the ABM Treaty has ceased<br />

to be operative, the question of the entry of the START II Treaty<br />

into force has fallen away, <strong>and</strong> other disarmament agreements<br />

are undergoing serious trials. The new Treaty was called upon<br />

to assist substantially the strengthening of the nonproliferation<br />

regime as well.” See “Statement by Alex<strong>and</strong>er Konuzin, Deputy<br />

Permanent Representative of Russia to the United Nations, at the<br />

Session of the UN Commission on Disarmament Held on April 1,<br />

2003.” SORT was ratified by the Duma on May 14, 2003 by votes<br />

of 294 deputies with 134 voting against <strong>and</strong> none abstaining.<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!