Educational Research - the Ethics and Aesthetics of Statistics

More documents

Recommendations

Info

114 E. Hemelsoet Vogel, D., & Kovacheva, V. (2008). Clandestino classification report. Quality assessment of estimates on stocks of irregular migrants. Athens: Clandestino. Watts, M., & Bridges, D. (Eds.). (2005). Higher education opportunities for refugees, asylum seekers and migrant workers in the East of England. Cambridge: Association of Universities in the East of England. Widgren, J. (1994). Multilateral Co-operation to Combat Trafficking in Migrants and the Role of International Organisations. Paper submitted to the 11th international organization for migration seminar on migration 26–28 October 1994, Geneva: International Response to Trafficking in Migrants and the Safeguarding of Migrant Rights, Paper number 6, Geneva: IOM. Woodbridge, J. (2005). Sizing the unauthorised (illegal) migrant population in the United Kingdom in 2001 (Home office online report 29/05). London: Migration Research Unit, University College London.
Chapter 8 European Citizenship and Evidence-Based Happiness Naomi Hodgson 8.1 Introduction Michel Foucault’s analysis of the development of modern forms of government in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and his account of governmentality opened up a perspective through which to analyse the operation of power (Foucault, 1991a, 1991b, 2005). The emergence of statistics – “the science of the state” (Foucault, 1991a, p. 99) – and the objects of statistical knowledge were identified as part of the complex of techniques for the production of a particular form of normalised individuality. More recent analyses from this perspective have shown how the object of government has shifted in advanced liberal modes of governmentality (e.g. Barry, Osborne, & Rose, 1996) and thus how the citizen has been reconceptualised in the context of the decline of the welfare state and the increasing privatisation of expertise, “implanting in citizens the aspiration to pursue their own civility, wellbeing and advancement” (Barry et al., 1996, p. 40; Biesta, 2009, p. 150). In this context, education or learning has become central to the production of a particular form of citizenship. Learning is no longer understood as taking place in particular institutions or designated periods in our lives (Rose, 1999) but as being a lifelong and life-wide process of self-improvement, requiring an attitude of willingness to adapt to the constantly changing demands of the globalised, competitive, knowledge economy (Simons & Masschelein, 2008). The role of statistics has also shifted: while “statistics might once have been a governmental activity, since the middle of the twentieth century it has become a business” (Rose, 2000, p. 230). From this perspective, I draw attention here to the objects of statistical analysis that provide a current focus for measurement and policy-making in Europe and thereby constitute key indicators according to which states, institutions and individuals become measurable, comparable and governable. I focus, in particular, here on happiness and well-being and how this relates to the construction of ‘active citizenship’ (Hoskins et al., 2006). N. Hodgson (B) Institute of Education, University of London, London, UK P. Smeyers, M. Depaepe (eds.), Educational Research: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Statistics, Educational Research 5, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-9873-3_8, C○ Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 115
Page 2 and 3:
Educational Research: The Ethics an
Page 4 and 5:
Paul Smeyers · Marc Depaepe Editor
Page 6:
Earlier Volumes in this Series Educ
Page 9:
viii Contents 10 The Good, the Beau
Page 12 and 13:
2 P. Smeyers and M. Depaepe their a
Page 14 and 15:
4 P. Smeyers and M. Depaepe more fo
Page 16 and 17:
6 P. Smeyers and M. Depaepe The cha
Page 18 and 19:
8 P. Smeyers and M. Depaepe concern
Page 20 and 21:
10 P. Smeyers and M. Depaepe appear
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 2 The Lure of Statistics fo
Page 25 and 26:
2 The Lure of Statistics for Educat
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35:
Page 38 and 39:
28 M. Depaepe of the Leuven Catholi
Page 40 and 41:
30 M. Depaepe Tan’s final verdict
Page 42 and 43:
32 M. Depaepe of methodological bot
Page 44 and 45:
34 M. Depaepe tapping other sources
Page 46 and 47:
36 M. Depaepe In the context of dem
Page 48 and 49:
38 M. Depaepe combination. Moreover
Page 50 and 51:
40 M. Depaepe 4. See Pelleriaux (19
Page 52 and 53:
42 M. Depaepe Schneider, J. (2010).
Page 54 and 55:
44 J.J.H. Dekker (see Section 4.4).
Page 56 and 57:
46 J.J.H. Dekker from their own par
Page 58 and 59:
48 J.J.H. Dekker a cohort study tha
Page 60 and 61:
50 J.J.H. Dekker child” (Van IJze
Page 62 and 63:
52 J.J.H. Dekker USA resulted in ev
Page 64 and 65:
54 J.J.H. Dekker of the problem”.
Page 66 and 67:
56 J.J.H. Dekker Dekker. J. J. H.,
Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 5 Constructing Social Unity
Page 71 and 72:
5 Constructing Social Unity and Pre
Page 73 and 74: 5 Constructing Social Unity and Pre
Page 89 and 90: Chapter 6 n = 1: The Science and Ar
Page 91 and 92: 6 n = 1: The Science and Art of the
Page 107 and 108: Chapter 7 To Frame the Unframable:
Page 109 and 110: 7 To Frame the Unframable: Quantify
Page 123: 7 To Frame the Unframable: Quantify
Page 127 and 128: 8 European Citizenship and Evidence
Page 137: 8 European Citizenship and Evidence
Page 140 and 141: 130 U. Stadler-Altmann and E. Keine
Page 156 and 157: 146 J.P. Van Bendegem et al. quite
Page 158 and 159: 148 J.P. Van Bendegem et al. expres
Page 160 and 161: 150 J.P. Van Bendegem et al. This i
Page 162 and 163: 152 J.P. Van Bendegem et al. A good
Page 164 and 165: 154 J.P. Van Bendegem et al. Day wi
Page 166 and 167: 156 J.P. Van Bendegem et al. statis
Page 168 and 169: 158 J.P. Van Bendegem et al. 10.4 C
Page 170 and 171: 160 J.P. Van Bendegem et al. Van Be
Page 172 and 173: 162 P. Smeyers to be told. Moreover
Page 174 and 175:
164 P. Smeyers us’. It goes witho
Page 176 and 177:
166 P. Smeyers at the basis of the
Page 178 and 179:
168 P. Smeyers indeterminism, as we
Page 180 and 181:
170 P. Smeyers are steps (a plan as
Page 182 and 183:
172 P. Smeyers to the simple fact t
Page 184 and 185:
174 P. Smeyers 6. The role of the a
Page 186 and 187:
176 P. Smeyers conditions. It is in
Page 188 and 189:
178 I. Munday etc. on a PowerPoint
Page 190 and 191:
180 I. Munday To show how Derrida p
Page 192 and 193:
182 I. Munday might talk of 20 bags
Page 194 and 195:
184 I. Munday is unclear whether th
Page 196 and 197:
186 I. Munday in numerals. This mig
Page 198 and 199:
188 I. Munday We might also note th
Page 200 and 201:
190 R. Smith ‘Statisticism’, on
Page 202 and 203:
192 R. Smith identify, and twice in
Page 204 and 205:
194 R. Smith of the final sentence
Page 206 and 207:
196 R. Smith between admitting that
Page 208 and 209:
198 R. Smith 7 www.equalitytrust.or
Page 210 and 211:
200 R. Smith It is an interesting q
Page 212 and 213:
202 R. Smith self-esteem, happiness
Page 214 and 215:
204 R. Smith Reeves, R. (2009, Apri
Page 216 and 217:
206 P. Standish Some students’ no
Page 218 and 219:
208 P. Standish abstract ratio, wit
Page 220 and 221:
210 P. Standish Rice $1.73 1 / 2 Mo
Page 222 and 223:
212 P. Standish research none of us
Page 224 and 225:
214 P. Standish of the products but
Page 226 and 227:
216 About the Authors co-editor-in-
Page 228 and 229:
218 About the Authors voor Wetensch
Page 230 and 231:
220 Author Index Elkins, G. R., 190
Page 232 and 233:
222 Author Index Silverman, J. G.,
Page 234:
224 Subject Index I Inequality, 29-
show all

Educational Research - the Ethics and Aesthetics of Statistics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?