29.10.2014 Views

Educational Research - the Ethics and Aesthetics of Statistics

Educational Research - the Ethics and Aesthetics of Statistics

Educational Research - the Ethics and Aesthetics of Statistics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 Child Maltreatment in <strong>the</strong> Last 50 Years 51<br />

as “possible ‘psychopathic or sociopathic characters’” (Kempe, Silverman, Steele,<br />

Droegemuller, & Silver, 1962; Jenny, 2008).<br />

Meanwhile, psychological abuse also became part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> phenomenon <strong>of</strong><br />

child maltreatment. In 1956 <strong>the</strong> Dutch psychologist <strong>and</strong> child protection specialist<br />

B. Clemens Schröner published a pioneering book on psychological child<br />

abuse. Kempe <strong>and</strong> his colleagues soon followed, generating a broader concept that<br />

included nutritional <strong>and</strong> emotional abuse (Clemens Schröner, 1956; Helfer,1974,<br />

p. 37). Finkelhor <strong>and</strong> his colleagues went even fur<strong>the</strong>r. They developed a concept<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> many elements, including <strong>the</strong> categories <strong>of</strong> (1) Physical assaults, bullying<br />

<strong>and</strong> teasing, (2) Sexual Victimisation, (3) Child Maltreatment, (4) Property<br />

Victimisations <strong>and</strong> (5) Witnessed <strong>and</strong> Indirect Victimisations. This expansion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

definition was no doubt <strong>of</strong> influence on <strong>the</strong> alarming percentages <strong>of</strong> victimisation<br />

among American children <strong>and</strong> youth (Finkelhor et al., 2005, p. 1297). The process<br />

<strong>of</strong> expansion intensified in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> studies, such as those by Straus <strong>and</strong><br />

Savage. These researchers came to alarming conclusions, namely that “half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

students experienced at least one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eight neglectful behaviors as children, <strong>and</strong><br />

about 12% experienced a pervasive pattern <strong>of</strong> neglect as indicated by three or more<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eight neglectful behaviors measured”. They also concluded that “high rates<br />

<strong>of</strong> neglectful behavior in both developed <strong>and</strong> underdeveloped countries <strong>and</strong> among<br />

a privileged sector <strong>of</strong> those countries” are normal. These conclusions resulted in<br />

<strong>the</strong> assertion that “helping parents avoid neglectful behavior could make a fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

contribution to <strong>the</strong> primary prevention <strong>of</strong> all types <strong>of</strong> family violence”. It is striking<br />

how different <strong>the</strong>ir definition is from Kempe’s. For Straus <strong>and</strong> Savage, neglectful<br />

behaviour encompasses not helping with homework, not comforting a child who<br />

is upset, not helping when <strong>the</strong> child had problems, not making sure <strong>the</strong> child goes<br />

to school, not helping <strong>the</strong> child to do its best, not giving <strong>the</strong> child enough clo<strong>the</strong>s<br />

to keep it warm, not keeping <strong>the</strong> child clean <strong>and</strong> not caring if <strong>the</strong> child gets into<br />

trouble at school. The “most frequent neglectful behavior was ‘not helping with<br />

homework’”. This behaviour was, according to this study, reported by 29% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

students, although <strong>the</strong> “percentage <strong>of</strong> parents in <strong>the</strong> 33 sites who did not help with<br />

homework ranged from 10% to 73%” (Straus & Savage, table 3, 2005).<br />

As a result, a great number <strong>of</strong> definitions <strong>of</strong> child abuse have been proposed. They<br />

can be “arranged in a continuum from very narrow to ra<strong>the</strong>r broad”. With <strong>the</strong> narrow<br />

definitions generally focused on physical abuse or on sexual abuse, <strong>the</strong> broadest<br />

definitions are related to <strong>the</strong> optimal development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> child. So, in <strong>the</strong> 1970s<br />

<strong>the</strong> Child Welfare League <strong>of</strong> America defined child abuse as “<strong>the</strong> denial <strong>of</strong> ‘normal<br />

experiences’ that produce feelings <strong>of</strong> being loved, wanted, secure <strong>and</strong> worthy”<br />

(Zigler & Hall, 1990, p. 45). The definitions are also, according to Giovannoni, characterised<br />

by vagueness. Moreover, <strong>the</strong>y are amorphous <strong>and</strong> ambiguous. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

groups, such as medical doctors, social workers <strong>and</strong> lawyers use <strong>the</strong>m in different<br />

ways (Giovannoni, 1990, pp. 10–16).<br />

This continuum <strong>of</strong> different definitions, used toge<strong>the</strong>r with different research<br />

methods, resulted in ano<strong>the</strong>r continuum, that <strong>of</strong> prevalence figures. The diverging<br />

figures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recently published Dutch prevalence studies with prevalence figures<br />

from 107,200 to 160,700 are no exception to <strong>the</strong> rule. Previous observations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!