02.11.2014 Views

untangling_the_web

untangling_the_web

untangling_the_web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DID: 4046925<br />

UNCLASSIFIEDhTeR eFFleh!tL I:JSE eNLY<br />

maintained by such entities as state, local, and even <strong>the</strong> US government. Most<br />

of this type of data simply cannot be removed from <strong>the</strong> public record.<br />

If you think we can stop companies like ZabaSearch, think again. As attorney Anita<br />

Ramasastry, points out, "[I]n a recent court case, <strong>the</strong> First Amendment has been<br />

held to allow publication even when it predictably will threaten <strong>the</strong> safety ofparticular<br />

individuals. Threats <strong>the</strong>mselves can be made criminal, consistent with <strong>the</strong> First<br />

Amendment. But when information is not itself a threat-but does pose one-courts<br />

have recently tended to allow <strong>the</strong> information to be published, even on <strong>the</strong><br />

Internet.,,226 [emphasis added] Ramasastry goes on to say that, in her opinion, sites<br />

providing this detailed kind of personal information should be requlated. However, at<br />

present only medical records are afforded <strong>the</strong> kind of legal protection many people<br />

would like to see extended to o<strong>the</strong>r types of information, e.g., bankruptcy records,<br />

divorce data, real estate transactions. As of now, this information is fair game, our<br />

privacy is under assault, and <strong>the</strong> balance of power is on <strong>the</strong> side of <strong>the</strong> First<br />

Amendment: "...when constitutions do protect privacy, <strong>the</strong>y typically protect it against<br />

invasion by <strong>the</strong> government-not by o<strong>the</strong>r citizens. Meanwhile on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r side of<br />

<strong>the</strong> balance, <strong>the</strong> First Amendment protects a person's right to speak and publish<br />

information, absent a compelling governmental interest in silence. So while privacy<br />

rights don't help those who find <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>the</strong> subject of digital dossiers, free<br />

speech rights do help <strong>the</strong> dossler-rnakers.r"" This is a difficult issue and one <strong>the</strong><br />

Founders could hardly have imagined because <strong>the</strong> concepts of things like<br />

computers, <strong>the</strong> Internet, and online identity <strong>the</strong>ft were simply unimaginable for <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Can You Opt Out of Online Directories?<br />

Many people are interested in (in some cases, desperate to) get <strong>the</strong>ir personal<br />

information out of <strong>the</strong> many online directories that now brazenly sport that data. The<br />

Privacy Rights Clearinghouse offers a very useful <strong>web</strong>page on this subject, including<br />

a handy chart of <strong>the</strong> major "data vendors" who do and who do not offer opt out<br />

provisions. The prospect of getting your personal information out of <strong>the</strong> many<br />

databases is daunting and some of <strong>the</strong> procedures are highly dubious. For example,<br />

to get your data out of PeopleFinders, you are required to provide <strong>the</strong> following<br />

information:<br />

Complete Social Security number, First name, Last name, Middle initial, Aliases<br />

and A.K.A.'s, Complete current address, Complete former addresses going back<br />

226 Anita Ramasastry, "Can We Stop ZabaSearch-and Similar Personal Information Search<br />

Engines?: When Data Democratization Verges on Privacy Invasion," FindLaw.com, 12 May 2005,<br />

(14 November 2006).<br />

227 Ramasastry.<br />

600 ' UNCLASSIFIEDNFOR OFFlel~L USE ONLY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!