Girls who like Boys who like Boys – Ethnography of ... - Yuuyami.com

that writing in and for Anthropology, I would have to face the fact that my
discipline, as a lens through which I observed, read, and projected, was only
one lens, after all. How this text has been written innately affects how the
topic in question is received. Yet even more so, the concepts of ethnography,
self-ethnography and culture, have been loaded with additional connotations,
as the opposing sides, both those advocating self-reflexivity and those
criticizing it, have assumed strong normative stances, dichotomizing a “good”
self-reflexive ethnography and a “bad” objectivist one – and vice versa. As
the researcher is faced with the need to justify her/his choices throughout the
course of research and text production, writing an ethnography, far from
having been the simple matter it was in the past, has been increasingly caught
in a politicized environment of factions. Though I would, naturally, prefer to
leave this text as is, this would miss the point of translating the meaning of a
fan-identity to an academic audience. In order to do so appropriately, it is
necessary to clarify what methodology was used in the process, or in other
words, in what context I encountered fans and in what context I let my fanmode
and my academic-mode meet each other. Yet, facing this need to
clarify, it is necessary to pass by the discipline, or rather pass by the concept
of social analysis, and to acknowledge where in Anthropology this text is
situated. What follows immediately then, is a sketched outline of the changes
some key concepts have undergone in the last twenty years, a “crash course”
23