Girls who like Boys who like Boys – Ethnography of ... - Yuuyami.com

increasingly aware of my connection to others, and in a way of their
cooperation throughout the process of writing this text. The question that
came to mind occasionally was, indeed, to what extent I deserved the authorial
position I held. Perhaps this is one of the fears and insecurities that led to
classical Anthropology’s dread of “becoming native.” But to an even greater
extent, I would argue, this unease sprang from the notion that holding such an
authorial position would inevitably equate the silencing of those I wrote about.
Hills’ words of warning regarding the precarious situation of fan-scholars and
scholar-fans and the attention they should pay to both of the contexts in which
they operate sprang to mind. After having witnessed multiple discussions in
fandom about banalities, as well as deep meta-discussions about theoretical
approaches to slash, and always having been aware of the highly interactive
qualities of the Internet (even to those lurking passively), taking on an
authorial position was precarious: the medium of this text is paper, and,
together with the conventions of academic writing, does not lend itself easily
to interactivity. Though not actively silencing the voices of those I worked
with, I had been the only one to hear them comment on the drafts of this
manuscript, and was, to a degree, obligated to lend them voices on this
medium. Not doing so would have, essentially, denied both the medium and
the communities of online fandom.
Attempting to develop some ideas to incorporate such interactivity if
possible, I had been nearly on the verge of giving up, thinking that my
38