06.11.2014 Views

learning-styles

learning-styles

learning-styles

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LSRC reference Section 7<br />

page 92/93<br />

the theoretical and conceptual development<br />

of a rationale for focusing on approaches and strategies<br />

for <strong>learning</strong><br />

refinements to the reliability and validity of a particular<br />

inventory to measure approaches to and strategies<br />

of <strong>learning</strong><br />

the implications for pedagogy<br />

theoretical development of the inventories used<br />

and/or their relationship to others.<br />

Most of the studies reviewed for this report fall into<br />

the first two categories and there appear to be no<br />

empirical evaluations of changes to pedagogy arising<br />

from use of the inventory.<br />

In order to make theories of <strong>learning</strong> more credible<br />

outside educational psychology, Entwistle and his<br />

colleagues have related psychological concepts<br />

to some of the wide range of variables that affect<br />

approaches and strategies to <strong>learning</strong>. These include<br />

the traditions and ethos of subject disciplines,<br />

institutional structures and cultures, curriculum<br />

organisation, and students’ past experience and<br />

motivation. In order to persuade teachers and students<br />

to develop sophisticated conceptions of both teaching<br />

and <strong>learning</strong>, Entwistle (1990, 669) believes that<br />

researchers have to recognise that ‘general theories<br />

of human <strong>learning</strong> are only of limited value in explaining<br />

everyday <strong>learning</strong>. It is essential for the theories to have<br />

ecological validity, for them to apply specifically to the<br />

context in which they are to be useful’. The ecological<br />

validity of the inventories and an underpinning model<br />

of <strong>learning</strong> are thought to be especially important<br />

if lecturers are to be persuaded to take student <strong>learning</strong><br />

seriously and to improve their pedagogy.<br />

Unlike other inventories reviewed in this report,<br />

those of Entwistle and Vermunt are the only two that<br />

attempt to develop a model of <strong>learning</strong> within the<br />

specific context of higher education. The research<br />

has influenced staff development programmes<br />

in HE institutions in Australia, South Africa, Sweden<br />

and the UK. Entwistle has written a large number<br />

of chapters and papers for staff developers and<br />

academics outside the discipline of education. The<br />

overall intention of theoretical development, systematic<br />

development of the inventories, and establishing<br />

evidence of their validity and reliability, is to create<br />

a convincing case that encourages lecturers to change<br />

their pedagogy and universities to support students<br />

in developing more effective approaches to <strong>learning</strong>.<br />

Entwistle is currently engaged on a project as part<br />

of the ESRC’s Teaching and Learning Research<br />

Programme (TLRP). This focuses on enhancing teaching<br />

and <strong>learning</strong> environments in undergraduate courses<br />

and supports 25 UK university departments in thinking<br />

about new ways to ‘encourage high quality <strong>learning</strong>’<br />

(see www.tlrp.org). This work takes account of the<br />

ways in which intensifying political pressures on quality<br />

assurance and assessment regimes in the UK affect<br />

<strong>learning</strong> and teaching.<br />

The inventory that arises from Entwistle’s model<br />

of <strong>learning</strong> is important for our review because<br />

a significant proportion of first-level undergraduate<br />

programmes is taught in FE colleges. Government<br />

plans to extend higher education to a broader range<br />

of institutions make it all the more important that<br />

pedagogy for this area of post-16 <strong>learning</strong> is based<br />

on sound research.<br />

Definitions and description<br />

The research of Entwistle and his colleagues draws<br />

directly on a detailed analysis of tests and models<br />

of <strong>learning</strong> <strong>styles</strong> developed by Pask, Biggs and<br />

Marton and Säljö (see the introduction to this section).<br />

This research derives from a number of linked concepts<br />

that underpin Entwistle’s view of <strong>learning</strong> and it is<br />

therefore important to note that terms in italics have<br />

a precise technical use in Entwistle’s work.<br />

The learner’s intentions and goals determine four<br />

distinct educational orientations: academic, vocational,<br />

personal and social.<br />

These orientations relate to extrinsic and intrinsic<br />

motivation and while discernible, these different types<br />

of motivation fluctuate throughout a degree course.<br />

Students hold conceptions of <strong>learning</strong> that tend<br />

to become increasingly sophisticated as they progress<br />

through a degree course; for example, unsophisticated<br />

students may see <strong>learning</strong> as increasing knowledge<br />

or acquiring facts, while more sophisticated students<br />

recognise that <strong>learning</strong> requires the abstraction<br />

of meaning and that understanding reality is based<br />

on interpretation (Entwistle 1990).<br />

Students’ orientations to, and conceptions of, <strong>learning</strong><br />

and the nature of knowledge both lead to and are<br />

affected by students’ typical approaches to <strong>learning</strong>.<br />

Students’ conceptions of <strong>learning</strong> are said to<br />

develop over time. An influential study by Perry (1970)<br />

delineated progression through different stages<br />

of thinking about the nature of knowledge and evidence.<br />

While this development takes on different forms in<br />

different subject disciplines, there are four discernible<br />

stages which may or may not be made explicit in<br />

the design of the curriculum or by university teachers:<br />

dualism (there are right and wrong answers)<br />

multiplicity (we do not always know the answers, people<br />

are entitled to different views and any one opinion,<br />

including their own, is as good as another)<br />

relativism (conclusions rest on interpretations from<br />

objective evidence, but different conclusions can<br />

justifiably be drawn)<br />

commitment (a coherent individual perspective on<br />

a discipline is needed, based on personal commitment<br />

to the forms of interpretation that develop through<br />

this perspective).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!