learning-styles
learning-styles
learning-styles
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Section 6<br />
Flexibly stable <strong>learning</strong> preferences<br />
LSRC reference<br />
page 60/61<br />
Introduction<br />
One of the most influential models of <strong>learning</strong> <strong>styles</strong><br />
was developed by David Kolb in the early 1970s.<br />
His theory of experiential <strong>learning</strong> and the instrument<br />
which he devised to test the theory – the Learning<br />
Style Inventory (LSI) – have generated a very<br />
considerable body of research. The starting point was<br />
his dissatisfaction with traditional methods of teaching<br />
management students, which led him to experiment<br />
with experiential teaching methods. He then observed<br />
that some students had definite preferences for some<br />
activities (eg exercises), but not others (eg formal<br />
lectures): ‘From this emerged the idea of an inventory<br />
that would identify these preferences by capturing<br />
individual <strong>learning</strong> differences’ (Kolb 2000, 8).<br />
For Kolb and for those who have followed in his tradition,<br />
a <strong>learning</strong> style is not a fixed trait, but ‘a differential<br />
preference for <strong>learning</strong>, which changes slightly from<br />
situation to situation. At the same time, there is some<br />
long-term stability in <strong>learning</strong> style’ (2000, 8). Kolb<br />
goes so far as to claim that the scores derived from<br />
the LSI are stable over very long periods; for example,<br />
the <strong>learning</strong> style of a 60 year old will bear a close<br />
resemblance to that individual’s <strong>learning</strong> style when<br />
he or she was an undergraduate of 20. It is, however,<br />
difficult to accept this claim when the necessary<br />
longitudinal research has still to be carried out.<br />
Be that as it may, Kolb’s four dominant <strong>learning</strong><br />
<strong>styles</strong> – diverging, assimilating, converging and<br />
accommodating, each located in a different quadrant<br />
of the cycle of <strong>learning</strong> – have been enormously<br />
influential in education, medicine and management<br />
training. Here it is more relevant to see Kolb as<br />
the main inspiration for large numbers of theorists<br />
and practitioners who have used his original<br />
ideas to generate their own questionnaires and<br />
teaching methods.<br />
For example, Honey and Mumford (2000) make<br />
explicit their intellectual debt to Kolb’s theory, although<br />
they also make it clear that they produced their<br />
own Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) because<br />
they found that Kolb’s LSI had low face validity<br />
with managers. They also made changes to Kolb’s<br />
nomenclature by substituting reflector, theorist,<br />
pragmatist and activist for Kolb’s rather more<br />
unwieldy terms: reflective observation, abstract<br />
conceptualisation, active experimentation and concrete<br />
experience. But as De Ciantis and Kirton (1996, 810)<br />
have pointed out: ‘the descriptions [of the four <strong>styles</strong>]<br />
they represent are, by design, essentially Kolb’s’.<br />
Honey and Mumford (2000) also give pride of place<br />
in their model to the <strong>learning</strong> cycle, which for them<br />
provides an ideal structure for reviewing experience,<br />
<strong>learning</strong> lessons and planning improvements.<br />
For Honey (2002, 116), the <strong>learning</strong> cycle is:<br />
flexible and helps people to see how they can enter<br />
the cycle at any stage with information to ponder,<br />
with a hypothesis to test, with a plan in search<br />
of an opportunity to implement it, with a technique<br />
to experiment with and see how well it works<br />
out in practice.<br />
In the US, McCarthy (1990) has developed a detailed<br />
method of instruction called 4MAT, which is explicitly<br />
based on Kolb’s theory of the cycle of <strong>learning</strong>, and<br />
which is receiving support from increasing numbers<br />
of US practitioners. We describe and evaluate 4MAT<br />
in Coffield et al. 2004 (Section 4) when discussing<br />
<strong>learning</strong> <strong>styles</strong> and pedagogy (see also Section 8 and<br />
Figure 13 of this report).<br />
In much the same way as Honey and Mumford were<br />
inspired by Kolb’s pioneering work, Allison and Hayes<br />
(1996) latched onto two notions (‘action’ and ‘analysis’)<br />
in Honey and Mumford’s LSQ when they were devising<br />
their own Cognitive Style Index (CSI). For Allinson and<br />
Hayes, style is defined as an individual’s characteristic<br />
and consistent approach to processing information,<br />
but they readily admit that a person’s style can be<br />
influenced by culture, experience or a particular context.<br />
At first reading, it may appear that Allinson and Hayes’<br />
fundamental dimension of style is brain-based, with<br />
action being characteristic of right-brain orientation,<br />
and analysis being characteristic of left-brain<br />
orientation. Their claim, however, is not substantiated<br />
by any research and so, in our view, Allinson and Hayes<br />
are more appropriately placed within the Kolbian<br />
‘family’ of <strong>learning</strong> theorists.<br />
6.1<br />
Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory (LSI)<br />
Introduction<br />
David Kolb, Professor of Organisational Behaviour<br />
at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland<br />
in the US, is widely credited with launching the modern<br />
<strong>learning</strong> <strong>styles</strong> movement in 1984 with the publication<br />
of Experiential <strong>learning</strong>: experience as the source<br />
of <strong>learning</strong> and development. That book summarised<br />
17 years of research into the theory of experiential<br />
<strong>learning</strong> and its applications to education, work<br />
and adult development. Kolb describes in this text<br />
how the LSI was created to assess individual<br />
orientations towards <strong>learning</strong>; and, because the<br />
LSI grew out of his theory of experiential <strong>learning</strong>,<br />
it is necessary to understand that theory and the<br />
place of the LSI within it.<br />
It has proved to be a highly productive approach as can<br />
be gauged from the fact that in 2000, Kolb produced<br />
a bibliography of research on his experiential <strong>learning</strong><br />
theory and the LSI which contains details of 1004<br />
studies in the fields of education (430), management<br />
(207), computer studies (104), psychology (101) and<br />
medicine (72), as well as nursing, accounting and law<br />
(see Mainemelis, Boyatzis and Kolb 2002). Kolb claims<br />
(1999) that an appreciation of differing <strong>learning</strong> <strong>styles</strong><br />
can help people to work more effectively in teams,<br />
resolve conflict, communicate at work and at home,<br />
and choose careers. The effects of the experiential<br />
<strong>learning</strong> theory and the LSI have been widespread and<br />
the instrument itself has been translated into Arabic,<br />
Chinese, French, Italian, Russian, Spanish and Swedish.