learning-styles
learning-styles
learning-styles
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LSRC reference Section 5<br />
page 50/51<br />
Implications for pedagogy<br />
Some supporters of the MBTI stress the versatility<br />
of individuals to move beyond their ‘dominant function’<br />
to exploit or develop ‘auxiliary preferences’ (Bayne<br />
1994); however, both Jung and Myers subscribed<br />
to a view of personality type as at least dominant<br />
by adulthood, suggesting that this versatility would<br />
be limited by the individual’s strong and habituated<br />
preferences. Moreover, the complex interaction<br />
of type dynamics tends to be obscured when the<br />
debate moves to ‘testing’ and ‘matching’ in educational<br />
contexts. Here, as elsewhere, the evidence is<br />
inconclusive: Hartman, Hylton and Sanders (1997)<br />
argue that their study of 323 undergraduates lends<br />
weight to the idea that some elements of MBTI type<br />
are linked to the dominance of a particular brain<br />
hemisphere (specifically, intuition-perceiving/<br />
right-brained and sensing-judging/left-brained), which<br />
implies that a change in style is less likely. The MBTI’s<br />
claim to classify individuals into taxonomic categories<br />
has been described (Bouchard and Hur 1998, 147)<br />
as ‘a controversial claim … virtually no mainstream<br />
personality researchers adopt this view … [and if]<br />
the latent traits underlying the MBTI are truly categorical<br />
rather than continuous, it is still likely to be the<br />
case that the influences underlying the categories<br />
are strongly genetic in origin.’ This calls into question<br />
the idea that MBTI results can or should be used for<br />
enhancing students’ repertoires of <strong>styles</strong>.<br />
Some MBTI advocates appear to accept the stability<br />
of types and suggest that the utility of the instrument<br />
lies in using test results to provide ‘matching’<br />
pedagogical experiences for students in a bid to<br />
improve retention (Van 1992) – in particular, taking<br />
account of the apparent correlation between high<br />
academic achievement and intuitive-judging types (NJ).<br />
Gordon and Yocke’s extremely small study (1999)<br />
of 22 new entrants to the teaching profession appears<br />
to support the link between sensing types and lower<br />
levels of performance. Sears, Kennedy and Kaye (1997)<br />
have mapped in detail the links between MBTI types<br />
and specialism choices among student teachers, and<br />
among other results, report the finding that sensing<br />
types are dominant among teachers in elementary<br />
(primary) education. Extra support for sensing types,<br />
including the provision of more practical and multimedia<br />
instructional opportunities is suggested, although<br />
the utility of this approach has been questioned<br />
by Spence and Tsai (1997). Their study was unable<br />
to find any significant relationship between MBTI type<br />
and method of information processing, finding instead<br />
that subjects used a range of methods which were<br />
task-specific. In addition, Di Tiberio (1996), reflecting<br />
on 10 years of research on the MBTI, concludes that<br />
there is no satisfactory evidence to suggest that<br />
matching instructor and learner style has any impact<br />
on student satisfaction or achievement.<br />
The use of the MBTI for ‘best fit’ career advice,<br />
while widespread, particularly in medicine (Stilwell<br />
et al. 1998) and business (McIntyre and Meloche 1995),<br />
is flawed because testing people already within<br />
a profession does not include the effects of environment<br />
and communities of practice on observable personality<br />
traits. In addition, there are gender differences in<br />
different professions; for example, correlations between<br />
type and career choice are much higher for female<br />
teachers than for male teachers. Moreover, the<br />
tendency to use the results from a group of vocational<br />
students as evidence of the range of career orientations<br />
within the population as a whole, or within a profession<br />
(see eg Jarlstrom 2000) is disturbing, since the obvious<br />
social, cultural and racial limitations of undergraduate<br />
samples are ignored.<br />
The MBTI, while it focuses on the personality type<br />
of the individual, has a well-established role in locating<br />
and understanding interpersonal and community<br />
dynamics. The findings of Edwards, Lanning and Hooker<br />
(2002, 445) that intuitive-judging types are ‘better<br />
able to rationally integrate situational factors in making<br />
judgements of personality’, may have some application<br />
to teacher–student relationships, particularly in relation<br />
to assessment. The MBTI has been adapted for<br />
many different countries and some advocates of the<br />
instrument feel that it has utility in describing national<br />
or cultural differences, for although Jung believed<br />
that type is universal, there may be differences<br />
in distribution and cultural influences which mitigate<br />
the expression of type (Quenck 2003). Abramson<br />
et al. (1993) argue, for example, that an awareness<br />
of the fact that Japanese MBA students have a more<br />
feeling-based cognitive style than Canadian MBA<br />
students, combined with a greater self-awareness<br />
on the part of managers about their own cognitive style,<br />
could improve business negotiations more effectively<br />
than simple ‘cultural awareness’ training.<br />
Empirical evidence for pedagogical impact<br />
As yet, evidence of use for the MBTI in terms of specific<br />
<strong>learning</strong> outcomes is sparse, although Woolhouse and<br />
Bayne (2000) claim that individual differences in the<br />
use of intuition are correlated with the sensing-intuitive<br />
dimension. Thorne and Gough (1999), in their analysis<br />
of 10 years of MBTI results, are able to identify only<br />
moderate links between high verbal and vocabulary<br />
scores and extrovert males and sensing females.<br />
Similarly, Harasym et al. (1995a, 1996) find that type<br />
does not predict achievement for nursing students,<br />
while Oswick and Barber (1998) find no correlation<br />
between MBTI type and achievement in their sample<br />
of undergraduates.