learning-styles
learning-styles
learning-styles
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LSRC reference Section 7<br />
page 110/111<br />
7.3<br />
Sternberg’s theory of thinking <strong>styles</strong> and his<br />
Thinking Styles Inventory (TSI)<br />
Introduction<br />
Robert Sternberg is a major figure in cognitive<br />
psychology; he is IBM professor of psychology and<br />
education at Yale University and was president<br />
of the American Psychological Association in 2003/04.<br />
His theory of mental self-government and model<br />
of thinking <strong>styles</strong> (1999) are becoming well known<br />
and are highly developed into functions, forms, levels,<br />
scope and leanings. He deals explicitly with the<br />
relationship between thinking <strong>styles</strong> and methods<br />
of instruction, as well as the relationship between<br />
thinking <strong>styles</strong> and methods of assessment. He also<br />
makes major claims for improving student performance<br />
via improved pedagogy.<br />
Table 39<br />
Summary of <strong>styles</strong><br />
of thinking<br />
Source: Sternberg (1999)<br />
Functions<br />
Legislative<br />
Executive<br />
Judicial<br />
Levels<br />
Global<br />
Local<br />
Forms<br />
Monarchic<br />
Hierarchic<br />
Oligarchic<br />
Anarchic<br />
Scope<br />
Internal<br />
External<br />
Leanings<br />
Liberal<br />
Conservative<br />
Definition, description and scope of the model<br />
Sternberg is keen to distinguish between style<br />
and ability. An ability ‘refers to how well someone<br />
can do something’. A style ‘refers to how someone<br />
likes to do something’. A style therefore is ‘a preferred<br />
way of using the abilities one has’ (1999, 8). ‘We do<br />
not have a style, but rather a profile of <strong>styles</strong>’<br />
(1999, 19; original emphasis).<br />
In his book on Thinking <strong>styles</strong> (1999), Sternberg used<br />
the two terms ‘thinking <strong>styles</strong>’ and ‘<strong>learning</strong> <strong>styles</strong>’<br />
as synonyms; for example (1999, 17): ‘Teachers<br />
fail to recognise the variety of thinking and <strong>learning</strong><br />
<strong>styles</strong> that students bring to the classroom and<br />
so teach them in ways that do not fit these <strong>styles</strong><br />
well.’ However, by 2001, Sternberg was making clear<br />
distinctions between <strong>learning</strong>, thinking and cognitive<br />
<strong>styles</strong>. In more detail, he conceptualised ‘<strong>learning</strong><br />
<strong>styles</strong>’ as how an individual prefers to learn by reading,<br />
for instance, or by attending lectures. ‘Thinking <strong>styles</strong>’<br />
are characterised as ‘how one prefers to think about<br />
material as one is <strong>learning</strong> it or after one already<br />
knows it’ (Sternberg and Zhang 2001, vii). ‘Cognitive<br />
<strong>styles</strong>’ are described as the ‘ways of cognizing (sic)<br />
the information’ (Sternberg and Zhang 2001, vii)<br />
by being impulsive and jumping to conclusions,<br />
or by being reflective. Cognitive <strong>styles</strong> are considered<br />
by Sternberg to be closer to personality than either<br />
thinking or <strong>learning</strong> <strong>styles</strong>.<br />
Sternberg’s theory of thinking/<strong>learning</strong> <strong>styles</strong> is<br />
derived from his theory of mental self-government,<br />
which is based on the metaphorical assumption<br />
(for which no evidence is offered) that the kinds<br />
of government we have in the world are not merely<br />
arbitrary or random constructions, but rather<br />
‘in a certain sense are mirrors of the mind … on this<br />
view, then, governments are very much extensions<br />
of individuals’ (1999, 148). Sternberg chooses four<br />
forms of government: monarchic, hierarchic, oligarchic<br />
and anarchic, but not democratic or dictatorial.<br />
No explanation is given as to why these four forms<br />
of government have been chosen and others excluded.<br />
His theory is constructed from three functions<br />
of government (legislative, executive and judicial);<br />
four forms (monarchical, hierarchical, oligarchic and<br />
anarchic); two levels (global and local); the scope<br />
of government which is divided into internal and<br />
external; and leanings (liberal and conservative).<br />
Each of these aspects of government is considered<br />
necessary for the management of the self in everyday<br />
life. Sternberg provides a diagrammatic summary<br />
of his <strong>styles</strong>; he does not call it a taxonomy, but that<br />
is what it amounts to (see Table 39).<br />
A brief description of the 13 <strong>styles</strong> is given below.<br />
1<br />
Legislative people like to come up with their own ways<br />
of doing things and prefer to decide for themselves<br />
what they will do and how they will do it. This style is<br />
particularly conducive to creativity: ‘In schools as well<br />
as at work, legislative people are often viewed as not<br />
fitting in, or perhaps as annoying.’ (1999, 33)<br />
2<br />
Executive people ‘like to follow rules and prefer<br />
problems that are pre-structured or prefabricated …<br />
executive stylists do what they are told and often do<br />
it cheerfully’ (1999, 21). They are implementers who<br />
like to follow as well as to enforce rules. They can often<br />
‘tolerate the kinds of bureaucracies that drive more<br />
legislative people batty’ (1999, 35).