learning-styles

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 1 List of learning-styles instruments and theories (models chosen for study in bold type) Author(s) Allinson and Hayes Measure Cognitive Style Index (CSI) Key terms/descriptors intuitive/analytic Date introduced 1996 Apter Motivational Style Profile (MSP) telic/paratelic – negativism/conformity – autic mastery/autic sympathy – alloic mastery/alloic sympathy – arousal avoidance/arousal seeking – optimism/pessimism – arousability – effortfulness 1998 Bartlett sensory modality preferences 1932 Betts Betts Inventory imagery 1909 Biggs Study Process Questionnaire surface/deep achieving 1987 Broverman automatisation – restructuring 1960 Cacioppo and Petty Need for Cognition Scale related to field dependence/independence – articulative/global 1982 Canfield Canfield Learning Style Inventory (CLSI) conditions – content – modes – expectancy 1980 Christensen Lifescripts (social context but relevant to cognition) analyser – controller – supporter – promoter 1980 Conti and Kolody Self-Knowledge Inventory of Lifelong Learning Skills (SKILLS) metacognition – metamotivation – memory – critical thinking – resource management 1990 Cooper Learning Styles ID visual/verbal – holist/analyst, environmental preference 1997 Curry ‘Onion’ model instructional preference – information processing style – cognitive personal style 1983 Das simultaneous/successive processing and planning 1988 Dunn and Dunn Learning Style Questionnaire (LSQ) Learning Styles Inventory (LSI) Productivity Environmental Preference Survey (PEPS) Building Excellence Survey (BES) environmental – emotional – sociological – physiological processing 1979 1975 1979 2003 Entwistle Approaches to Study Inventory (ASI) Revised Approaches to Study Inventory (RASI) Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) meaning orientation – reproducing orientation – achieving orientation – non-academic orientation – self-confidence deep approach – surface approach – strategic approach – lack of direction – academic self-confidence – metacognitive awareness 1979 1995 2000 Epstein and Meier Constructive Thinking Inventory (CTI) emotional coping – behavioural coping – personal superstitious thinking – categorical thinking – esoteric thinking – naïve optimism – global constructive thinking 1989 Felder and Silverman Index of Learning Styles (ILS) active/reflective – sensing/intuitive – visual/verbal – sequential/global 1996 Friedman and Stritter Instructional Preference Questionnaire 1976 Galbraith and James perceptual ability 1984 Gardner et al. tolerant/intolerant 1959 Gordon Scale of Imagery Control imagery 1949
LSRC reference page 166/167 Author(s) Grasha-Riechmann Measure Student Learning Style Scales (SLSS) Key terms/descriptors competitive/collaborative – independent/dependent – participant/avoidant Date introduced 1974 Gregorc Gregorc Mind Styles Delineator (MSD) concrete sequential/abstract random – abstract sequential/concrete random 1977 Groner Cognitive Style Scale heuristic/algorithmic 1990 Guilford convergent/divergent thinking 1950 Harrison-Branson Revised Inquiry Mode Questionnaire synthesist – idealist – pragmatist – analyst – realist 1998 Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument (HBDI) theorist/humanitarian – organiser/innovator 1995 Hermanussen, Wierstra, de Jong and Thijssen Questionnaire Practice-oriented Learning (QPL) immersion – reflection – conceptualisation – experimentation – regulation 2000 Hill Cognitive Style Profile symbol processing – modalities of inference – cultural determinants 1976 Holzman and Klein Schematising Test leveller/sharpener 1954 Honey and Mumford Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) activist/reflector – theorist/pragmatist 1982 Hudson (following Guilford) diverging/converging 1966 Hunt Paragraph Completion Method need for structure: conforming – dependent 1978 Jackson Learning Styles Profiler (LSP) initiator – analyst – reasoner – implementer 2002 Kagan Matching Familiar Figures Test impulsivity/reflexivity – focus/scan 1965 1967 Kaufmann The A-E Inventory assimilator/explorer 1989 Keefe and Monke (NASSP) NASSP Learning Style Profile (explicit attempt at meta-taxonomy) physiological – environmental – cognitive – affective domains plus information processing 1986 Kirby et al. Multidimensional verbal-visual LSQ verbal/visual 1988 Kirton Kirton Adaption-Innovation inventory (KAI) adaptor/innovator 1989 Kogan Sorting styles into types 3 types of style: maximal performance (ability) measures value directionality (advantageous) styles value-differentiated measures 1973 Kolb Learning Style Inventory (LSI) Revised Learning Style Inventory (R-LSI) LSI Version 3 accommodating – diverging – converging – assimilating styles 1976 1985 1999 Letteri Cognitive Style Delineators analytic/global 1980 Marks Marks Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire imagery 1973 Marton and Säljö deep/surface processing 1976
Page 1 and 2:
LSRC reference Learning styles and
Page 3 and 4:
LSRC reference Learning styles and
Page 5 and 6:
LSRC reference Contents 1 9 13 37 4
Page 7 and 8:
LSRC reference Figures and tables L
Page 9 and 10:
LSRC reference Acknowledgements The
Page 11 and 12:
Section 1 A systematic review of le
Page 13 and 14:
LSRC reference Section 1 page 2/3 E
Page 15 and 16:
LSRC reference Section 1 page 4/5 T
Page 17 and 18:
LSRC reference Section 1 page 6/7 T
Page 19 and 20:
Figure 3 Vermunt’s model of learn
Page 21 and 22:
We devised this classificatory syst
Page 23 and 24:
The popular appeal of the notion th
Page 25 and 26:
Figure 5 Gregorc’s four-channel l
Page 27 and 28:
From the evidence available, we con
Page 29 and 30:
Table 1 Gregorc’s Mind Styles Mod
Page 31 and 32:
Table 2 Variables and factors in th
Page 33 and 34:
The measures Over 25 years, Dunn an
Page 35 and 36:
Table 4 Percentages of respondents
Page 37 and 38:
The BES instrument has elements for
Page 39 and 40:
Shwery (1994) also questioned aspec
Page 41 and 42:
However, the notion of ‘gifted’
Page 43 and 44:
Second, the model encourages teache
Page 45 and 46:
Table 6 Dunn and Dunn’s model and
Page 47 and 48:
The most influential member of the
Page 49 and 50:
Table 9 Studies of the interaction
Page 51 and 52:
Riding and Rayner (1998) do not def
Page 53 and 54:
Implications for pedagogy Riding (2
Page 55 and 56:
Section 5 Stable personality type L
Page 57 and 58:
LSRC reference Section 5 page 48/49
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Section 6 Flexibly stable learning
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Section 7 Learning approaches and s
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122: LSRC reference Section 7 page 112/1
Page 127 and 128: Section 8 Implications for pedagogy
Page 141 and 142: Our recommendation in favour of inc
Page 143 and 144: As for the research evidence in fav
Page 145 and 146: Learning styles in practice: labell
Page 147 and 148: Table 44 13 learning-styles models
Page 149 and 150: It may be argued that it is importa
Page 151 and 152: The comparative neglect of knowledg
Page 153 and 154: LSRC reference page 146/147 Referen
Page 155 and 156: LSRC reference References page 148/
Page 171: LSRC reference References page 164/
Page 175 and 176: LSRC reference Appendix 1 page 168/
Page 177 and 178: Appendix 3 Glossary of terms LSRC r
Page 179 and 180: LSRC reference Appendix 3 page 172/
show all

learning-styles

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?