learning-styles
learning-styles
learning-styles
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 13<br />
The 4MAT system<br />
Source: McCarthy (1990)<br />
Concrete<br />
experience<br />
What happens ‘on the street’<br />
8<br />
Doing it and<br />
applying to new,<br />
more complex<br />
experience<br />
(right mode)<br />
1<br />
Creating an<br />
experience<br />
(right mode)<br />
7<br />
Analysing<br />
application<br />
for relevance,<br />
usefulness<br />
(left mode)<br />
4<br />
Expression<br />
Self<br />
1<br />
2<br />
Reflecting,<br />
analysing<br />
experience<br />
(left mode)<br />
Active<br />
experimentation<br />
Critical<br />
Transitions<br />
Reflective<br />
observation<br />
6<br />
Practising<br />
and adding<br />
something<br />
of oneself<br />
(right mode)<br />
3<br />
Content<br />
2<br />
3<br />
Integrating<br />
reflective analysis<br />
into concepts<br />
(right mode)<br />
5<br />
Practising<br />
defined ‘givens’<br />
(left mode)<br />
4<br />
Developing<br />
concepts, skills<br />
(left mode)<br />
What happens in schools<br />
Abstract<br />
conceptualisation<br />
Felder is complaining here about the negative<br />
outcomes of unintentional mismatching where,<br />
for instance, teachers are unaware of their<br />
own <strong>learning</strong> style and may, as a result, teach only<br />
in that style, thus favouring certain students and<br />
disadvantaging others. The response to such<br />
difficulties, according to Felder (1993, 289), is ‘not<br />
to determine each student’s <strong>learning</strong> style and then<br />
teach to it exclusively’, but to ‘teach around the<br />
<strong>learning</strong> cycle’. Before turning to that strategy, we wish<br />
to stress that deliberate mismatching has the status<br />
of an intuitively appealing argument which awaits<br />
empirical verification or refutation.<br />
‘Teach around the <strong>learning</strong> cycle’ or the<br />
4MAT system<br />
This phrase refers to an eight-step instructional<br />
sequence created by McCarthy (1990) which seeks<br />
to accommodate both preferences for using the<br />
two hemispheres of the brain in <strong>learning</strong> and what she<br />
considers to be the four main <strong>learning</strong> <strong>styles</strong>. Each<br />
of these <strong>styles</strong> asks a different question and displays<br />
different strengths.<br />
Imaginative learners who demand to know ‘why’?<br />
This type of learner likes to listen, speak, interact<br />
and brainstorm.<br />
Analytic learners who want to know ‘what’ to learn.<br />
These learners are most comfortable observing,<br />
analysing, classifying and theorising.<br />
Common-sense learners who want to know<br />
‘how’ to apply the new <strong>learning</strong>. These learners<br />
are happiest when experimenting, manipulating,<br />
improving and tinkering.<br />
Dynamic learners who ask ‘what if?’ This type of learner<br />
enjoys modifying, adapting, taking risks and creating.<br />
Her 4MAT system uses alternate right- and left-mode<br />
techniques of brain processing at all four stages<br />
of the <strong>learning</strong> cycle in order to engage the ‘whole brain’.<br />
The 4MAT system was designed to help teachers<br />
improve their teaching by using eight strategies in<br />
a cycle of <strong>learning</strong> (see Figure 13).