learning-styles
learning-styles
learning-styles
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
From the evidence available, we conclude that the<br />
GSD is flawed in construction. Even though those<br />
flaws might have been expected to spuriously inflate<br />
measures of reliability and validity, the GSD does<br />
not have adequate psychometric properties for use<br />
in individual assessment, selection or prediction.<br />
However, the reliability of composite GSD measures<br />
has not been formally assessed and it is possible that<br />
these may prove to be more acceptable statistically.<br />
General<br />
Writing in 1979, Gregorc lists other aspects of style,<br />
including preferences for deduction or induction,<br />
for individual or group activity and for various<br />
environmental conditions. These he sees as more<br />
subject to developmental and environmental influences<br />
than the four channels which he describes as<br />
‘properties of the self, or soul’ (1979, 224). However,<br />
no evidence for this metaphysical claim is provided.<br />
We are not told how Gregorc developed the special<br />
abilities to determine the underlying causes (noumena)<br />
of behaviour (pheno) and the nature of the learner<br />
(logos) by means of his ‘phenomenological’ method.<br />
The concept of sequential, as opposed to simultaneous<br />
or holistic, processing is one that is long established<br />
in philosophy and psychology, and is analogous<br />
to sequential and parallel processing in computing.<br />
Here, Gregorc’s use of the term ‘random’ is value-laden<br />
and perhaps inappropriate, since it does not properly<br />
capture the power of intuition, imagination, divergent<br />
thinking and creativity. Although the cognitive and<br />
emotional mental activity and linkages behind intuitive,<br />
empathetic, ‘big picture’ or ‘out of the box’ thinking are<br />
often not fully explicit, they are by no means random.<br />
It is probable that the ‘ordering’ dimension in which<br />
Gregorc is interested does not apply uniformly across<br />
all aspects of experience, especially when emotions<br />
come into play or there are time or social constraints<br />
to cope with. Moreover, opposing ‘sequential’ to<br />
‘random’ can create a false dichotomy, since there are<br />
many situations in which thinking in terms of part-whole<br />
relationships requires a simultaneous focus on parts<br />
and wholes, steps and patterns. To seek to capture<br />
these dynamic complexities with personal reactions<br />
to between 10 and 20 words is clearly a vain ambition.<br />
Similar arguments apply to the perceptual dimension<br />
concrete-abstract. It is far from clear that these terms<br />
and the clusters of meaning which Gregorc associates<br />
with them represent a unitary dimension, or indeed<br />
much more than a personal set of word associations<br />
in the mind of their originator. Lack of clarity is apparent<br />
in Gregorc’s description of the ‘concrete random’<br />
channel as mediating the ‘concrete world of reality<br />
and abstract world of intuition’ (1982b, 39). He also<br />
describes the world of feeling and emotions as<br />
‘abstract’ and categorises thinking that is ‘inventive<br />
and futuristic’ and where the focus of attention is<br />
‘processes and ideals’ as ‘concrete’.<br />
Implications for pedagogy<br />
Gregorc’s model differs from Kolb’s (1999) in that<br />
it does not represent a <strong>learning</strong> cycle derived from<br />
a theory of experiential <strong>learning</strong>. However, Gregorc was<br />
at one time a teacher and teacher-educator and argues<br />
that knowledge of <strong>learning</strong> <strong>styles</strong> is especially important<br />
for teachers. As the following quotation (1984, 54)<br />
illustrates, he contends that strong correlations exist<br />
between the individual’s disposition, the media, and<br />
teaching strategies.<br />
Individuals with clear-cut dispositions toward concrete<br />
and sequential reality chose approaches such as ditto<br />
sheets, workbooks, computer-assisted instruction,<br />
and kits. Individuals with strong abstract and random<br />
dispositions opted for television, movies, and group<br />
discussion. Individuals with dominant abstract and<br />
sequential leanings preferred lectures, audio tapes,<br />
and extensive reading assignments. Those with<br />
concrete and random dispositions were drawn to<br />
independent study, games, and simulations. Individuals<br />
who demonstrated strength in multiple dispositions<br />
selected multiple forms of media and classroom<br />
approaches. It must be noted, however, that despite<br />
strong preferences, most individuals in the sample<br />
indicated a desire for a variety of approaches in order<br />
to avoid boredom.<br />
Gregorc believes that students suffer if there is a lack<br />
of alignment between their adaptive abilities (<strong>styles</strong>)<br />
and the demands placed on them by teaching methods<br />
and <strong>styles</strong>. Teachers who understand their own <strong>styles</strong><br />
and those of their learners can reduce the harm they<br />
may otherwise do and ‘develop a repertoire of authentic<br />
skills’ (Gregorc 2002). Gregorc argues against attempts<br />
to force teachers and learners to change their natural<br />
<strong>styles</strong>, believing that this does more harm than good<br />
and can alienate people or make them ill.