learning-styles
learning-styles
learning-styles
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The theory is an evolving one and Apter (2001, 307)<br />
acknowledges the need for ‘a systematic developmental<br />
underpinning for the theory’ as well as the ‘need to<br />
develop specific techniques that would allow people<br />
to come more in control of their own reversal processes’<br />
(2001, 306). This is a difficult area, since Apter has<br />
posited an unconscious biological basis for reversal<br />
without fully accounting for its adaptive value. There<br />
is, nonetheless, an impressive amount of empirical<br />
evidence which supports reversal theory. Apter and<br />
Heskin (2001) have summarised the research evidence<br />
which supports the basic propositions of the theory,<br />
including some studies in which reversal was monitored<br />
during educationally relevant activities such as studying<br />
statistics and reading.<br />
While Apter does not claim that his four domains are<br />
the only way of conceptualising psychological needs,<br />
he does (2001, 39) claim exhaustiveness in the sense<br />
that for a given pair of motivational states, ‘one or the<br />
other will be active during the whole of waking life’.<br />
He allows that a pair of states may be more or less<br />
central or peripheral in awareness, but not that<br />
both may disappear altogether from consciousness.<br />
However, it is not clear whether this is a logical or<br />
empirical claim, and if the latter, whether it is falsifiable.<br />
Apter does not seem to allow for the simultaneous<br />
activation of pairs of states such as goal-oriented<br />
(telic) and activity-oriented (paratelic). Yet if<br />
simultaneous activation does not occur, it is difficult<br />
to explain behaviour where both are required, such<br />
as the performance of musicians and stand-up comics,<br />
where the experience of flow is at once enjoyment<br />
and achievement.<br />
Apter’s treatment of arousal-avoidance and<br />
arousal-seeking is not fully consistent, since these<br />
are assimilated within the telic-paratelic dimension<br />
in much of his writing, but treated as a separate dimensi<br />
on in the MSP. The MSP approach is more convincing,<br />
since while peace and quiet may generally help people<br />
to focus on goal achievement, this is not always so.<br />
Reversal theory is based on clear definitions and has<br />
a clear structure, despite the use of invented terms<br />
to refer to the poles of two dimensions (‘telic’ and<br />
‘paratelic’ in the case of the means-end dimension<br />
and ‘autic’ and ‘alloic’ as applied to relationships).<br />
While some features of the theory can be questioned,<br />
Apter (2001) has set it out in a highly coherent form,<br />
with four basic assumptions and 10 basic propositions.<br />
Although it is a theory of personality rather than<br />
of <strong>learning</strong>, reversal theory does provide a conceptual<br />
framework for asking questions in a systematic way<br />
about approaches to <strong>learning</strong>, especially about<br />
motivation, feelings about <strong>learning</strong> and personal style.<br />
Its dimensions are not new, but the concept of reversal<br />
is refreshingly novel and provides a real challenge<br />
to theorists who seek to pigeonhole individuals in terms<br />
of fixed characteristics.<br />
It is helpful to consider reversal theory in the context<br />
of other theories and models of thinking, <strong>learning</strong><br />
and personal style. Apter’s telic-paratelic dimension<br />
is conceptually linked with extrinsic versus intrinsic<br />
motivation and with convergent versus divergent<br />
thinking. A telic orientation may also be what motivates<br />
some learners to approach study with the aim of gaining<br />
high examination marks, while some students who<br />
do not take their studies seriously may have a paratelic<br />
orientation. Deep absorption in studying a subject<br />
can be an end in itself or be motivated by a serious<br />
academic ambition, while ‘surface’ learners may<br />
become more interested if teachers find ways of making<br />
<strong>learning</strong> more enjoyable. There is a family resemblance<br />
between Apter’s conformist-negativistic dimension,<br />
Sternberg’s (1998) hierarchic and anarchic thinking<br />
<strong>styles</strong> and Kirton’s distinction (1989) between adaptors<br />
and innovators. Apter’s concept of autic mastery<br />
reflects values of individualism and competitiveness,<br />
while alloic sympathy reflects values of social belonging<br />
and cooperation.<br />
Most importantly, the key concept of reversal has major<br />
implications for how we think about <strong>learning</strong> <strong>styles</strong>.<br />
It leads us to expect reversals between <strong>learning</strong> <strong>styles</strong><br />
as well as some degree of individual consistency<br />
over time, and it strongly suggests that productive<br />
<strong>learning</strong> <strong>styles</strong> can be fostered by creating <strong>learning</strong><br />
environments though which important values are<br />
conveyed and in which reversals through boredom<br />
and satiation are less likely to occur.<br />
Evaluation of the MSP and of related instruments<br />
The MSP items are written in simple language, with<br />
a readability level of about 9 years. Most are clearly<br />
expressed, but some (especially those beginning<br />
with ‘I like…’) can be read in more than one way.<br />
For example, I may respond that I always ‘like to be<br />
liked’, meaning that being liked is a common experience<br />
for me; or I may, by the same response, mean that<br />
I always like the experience of being liked, even though<br />
I do not have it very often.<br />
The MSP is fairly robust in psychometric terms,<br />
with internal consistency of the 14 sub-scales in the<br />
range 0.64 to 0.89 for the UK version and test–retest<br />
correlations in the range 0.73 to 0.92 over a 12-week<br />
period (Apter, Mallows and Williams 1998). The<br />
most stable sub-scales were those for other-oriented<br />
affection, optimism, excitement and fun.