06.11.2014 Views

A User Centric Security Model for Tamper-Resistant Devices

A User Centric Security Model for Tamper-Resistant Devices

A User Centric Security Model for Tamper-Resistant Devices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.2 Issuer <strong>Centric</strong> Smart Card Ownership <strong>Model</strong> (ICOM)<br />

Communication Control. A smart card can communicate on dierent interfaces (e.g.<br />

contact, contactless) and protocols as web enabling protocols [87], T1, T2 [88], and NFC-<br />

WI [89]. The issuer can regulate the mechanism through which an application on their<br />

smart card can communicate with o-card entities. For example, the Oyster application<br />

on the Barclaycard OnePulse card will not communicate with any o-card entity through<br />

a contact based interface. However, it does communicate via a contactless interface.<br />

Marketing and Customer Loyalty. The plastic card surface is considered to be marketing<br />

real estate by the card issuers. For most deployments, the card surface is used to<br />

print the company names and logos. In the banking industry <strong>for</strong> example, a typical smart<br />

card will have the issuer bank's name and logo. It might also have the insignia of the<br />

payment clearing system (i.e. VISA, MasterCard or American Express, etc.). In addition,<br />

the concept that having a smart card with a particular brand translates into the customer<br />

loyalty to the organisation has its roots in the initial smart card deployment (i.e. Dinner's<br />

Club card). Encouraging customer loyalty denitely had its benets in some industries like<br />

banking, but it might be less benecial in industries like mobile telecom here the smart<br />

card module is hidden inside the mobile phone.<br />

3.2.2 Drawbacks of the ICOM<br />

The ICOM has been successfully deployed over the past decade, but it has minor drawbacks<br />

that are listed below:<br />

Card Handling. Usually, an individual will require a number of smart cards 3 [91] <strong>for</strong>:<br />

train or bus journeys, mobile phones, oce building access, internet/oce-network access,<br />

banking/shopping and health services, and other purposes. With increasing numbers of<br />

industries relying on smart cards to provide their services to customers, the customer's<br />

wallet is becoming crowded with smart cards. <strong>User</strong>s of smart card-based services already<br />

have to carry a large number of smart cards and with each new service they enrol <strong>for</strong>,<br />

they get more. To maintain and manage these cards sometimes becomes troublesome to<br />

cardholders who have to use diverse services.<br />

Stringent <strong>Model</strong>. The concept of the smart card as a medium <strong>for</strong> promoting customer<br />

loyalty and as a marketing avenue took centre stage in business strategy; dierent card<br />

issuers started to consolidate their customer base and this in turn created a situation in<br />

3 A Survey [90] conducted in 2008 by Federal Reserve Bank of Boston showed that an average American<br />

consumer has 5.4 banking cards (i.e. prepaid, credit, and debit cards).<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!