10.11.2014 Views

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A possible retrieval of deposited canisters also imposes demands on the safeguards system. It<br />

is vital to be able to establish unambiguously the identify of the canisters retrieved. This means<br />

that the marking of the canisters must be very durable. The same applies to the information on<br />

the canister’s contents. Otherwise, the same principles can be applied to retrieval, transport and<br />

interim storage as to the various steps in deposition of the canisters.<br />

Physical protection includes guarding and other measures that are undertaken to protect the fuel<br />

and other radioactive material from theft or sabotage. There is a well-functioning system for<br />

physical protection during handling and transport. At the deep repository facility, the operations<br />

area will be fenced-in and watched by surveillance equipment in a similar manner as at other<br />

nuclear installations. Access to the area will be controlled and checked in a manner similar to<br />

what is done at the nuclear installations in operation today. No physical protection is needed in<br />

a sealed repository. Instead, monitoring can be coordinated with safeguards supervision via for<br />

example satellite surveillance.<br />

Conclusions in RD&D 2001 and its review<br />

In its review of RD&D 2001, SKI stated its opinion that the areas of safeguards and physical<br />

protection of the deep repository were described in very general terms and SKI maintained that<br />

high demands must be made with respect to both safeguards for the fissile material and physical<br />

protection of the same. <strong>SKB</strong> does not fully concur with this objection, since it is the inspection<br />

bodies Euratom, IAEA and SKI who design safeguards for the deep repository. <strong>SKB</strong> has a great<br />

interest in cooperating with the inspection bodies at an early stage in order to be able to adapt<br />

the design of the deep repository facility so that safeguards are facilitated.<br />

Newfound knowledge since RD&D 2001<br />

The IAEA, Euratom and SKI collaborate in and organize international working groups for safeguards<br />

for both encapsulation and geological repositories for spent nuclear fuel. <strong>SKB</strong> believes<br />

that early cooperation with the inspection bodies on safeguards is important to ensure that<br />

the facilities are designed in such a way that safeguards are facilitated. By participating in the<br />

international working groups and “Esarda Working Group on the Back End of the Nuclear Fuel<br />

Cycle” and “IAEA Experts Group on Safeguards for Final Disposal of Spent Fuel in Geological<br />

Repositories”, <strong>SKB</strong> wishes to ensure an early exchange of information and cooperation.<br />

Among other things, the working groups have received information at the Äspö HRL about<br />

how handling of nuclear materials and deposition of canisters is planned to take place in the<br />

deep repository. <strong>SKB</strong> also informed the IAEA at a meeting in Oskarshamn /12-8/ how and<br />

what information is gathered during the site investigation phase. At the meeting, <strong>SKB</strong> also<br />

pointed out the opportunity which the collected information provides to the inspection bodies<br />

for obtaining Primary Baseline data, which may be needed in the future to identify changes that<br />

could indicate diversion of nuclear material.<br />

The whole issue of safeguards will be taken into account when designing the deep repository.<br />

Spaces for monitoring equipment etc are being planned in keeping with the viewpoints of the<br />

inspection bodies, and the facility is being designed with as much transparency as possible.<br />

The trend within safeguards is that traditional safeguards measures (seal, camera inspections,<br />

etc) will be supplemented or partially replaced by indirect controls such as measurements in<br />

the surrounding environment, gathering of open information and unannounced inspections.<br />

This trend will naturally influence the design of the safeguards system at the time of the permit<br />

application. An example of this trend is the so-called additional protocol /12-9/.<br />

<strong>Programme</strong><br />

During the period 2005–2010, <strong>SKB</strong> will keep track of international developments in the field,<br />

but does not plan to conduct any development or demonstration of monitoring equipment or the<br />

like for the safeguards purposes of its own.<br />

142 RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> <strong>2004</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!