10.11.2014 Views

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7 Canister – qualification<br />

Before the encapsulation plant and the canister factory are taken into service, qualification of<br />

methods for fabrication, welding and nondestructive testing of canisters must be carried out.<br />

Qualification of the processes consists of documented investigations that ensure that the<br />

finished canisters satisfy the ultimate requirement of being a reliable barrier in the deep repository.<br />

Requirements will be specified for each process, after which the process will be qualified<br />

to these requirements. A programme will be prepared for qualification and presented as a<br />

supporting document for the permit application for the encapsulation plant.<br />

The qualification work can be divided into qualification of methods for fabrication and welding<br />

and qualification of methods for nondestructive testing. This is described in greater detail in<br />

sections 7.1 and 7.2.<br />

7.1 Qualification of methods for fabrication and welding<br />

As is evident from Chapter 6, <strong>SKB</strong> is working in parallel on the development of two welding<br />

methods at the Canister Laboratory: friction stir welding (FSW) and electron beam welding<br />

(EBW). Prior to an application for a permit to erect the encapsulation plant, the methods for<br />

sealing and nondestructive testing (NDT) must be determined.<br />

The choice of reference welding method can be viewed as the first step of qualification.<br />

A number of criteria have been formulated for this. The methods must fulfil these criteria<br />

and be evaluated in reference to them. Some of the criteria are:<br />

• Reliability. The risk that defects will arise that exceed the acceptance criteria for the sealing<br />

welds must be low. It must be possible to control the welding process by means of variable<br />

parameters.<br />

• Robustness. The probability of disturbances that affect weld quality must be low. Small,<br />

unforeseen or normal changes in welding parameters, equipment or the surrounding environment<br />

must not affect the quality of the weld. The process window, i.e. the interval within<br />

which the welding parameters must lie in order for the quality of the weld to be acceptable,<br />

must be large in comparison with the tolerances of the process parameters.<br />

• Repeatability. The same welding parameters and surrounding environment must give the<br />

same weld quality. Changes in weld quality must be able to be attributed to changes in<br />

parameters and the surrounding environment. After service and maintenance of the welding<br />

equipment, the same welding parameters must give undiminished weld quality.<br />

• Testability. The discontinuities that can arise in the process must be detectable with<br />

sufficient probability by means of NDT. The forms for this evaluation are described in<br />

greater detail in section 7.2.<br />

<strong>SKB</strong>’s task is now to finish the development of the welding processes and equipment and verify<br />

that the above criteria are fulfilled. Much of the fundamental development of the welding processes<br />

and equipment has already been done. What remains to be done is to better quantify some<br />

of the important variables and how they affect each other, and establish the optimal settings for<br />

stable operation. Furthermore, <strong>SKB</strong> must demonstrate that it is possible to weld with sufficiently<br />

high quality under conditions similar to those of serial production sealing in the encapsulation<br />

plant.<br />

RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> <strong>2004</strong> 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!