10.11.2014 Views

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Newfound knowledge since RD&D 2001<br />

Existing fractures that intersect deposition holes can be activated and sheared by a earthquake.<br />

The effect of such a rock shear has been investigated in a project that includes both laboratory<br />

tests and finite element calculations. /17-11, 17-12/.<br />

The buffer material in a deposition hole acts as a cushion between the canister and the rock,<br />

which reduces the effect of a rock shear substantially. The lower the density the softer the buffer<br />

and the less the effect on the canister. However, at the high densities proposed for the buffer in a<br />

deep repository, its stiffness is rather high. Stiffness is also a function of the rate of shear, which<br />

means that the canister can be damaged at very high shear rates.<br />

In order to investigate the stiffness and shear strength of the buffer material, a number of<br />

laboratory test series have been performed with shearing of water-saturated bentonite samples<br />

at different densities and shear rates. Based on these tests, a material model of the buffer that<br />

takes into account density and shear rate has been formulated. Tests have been carried out with<br />

shear rates of up to 6 m/s.<br />

The rock shear has been modelled and calculated with the finite element code Abaqus. A threedimensional<br />

finite element mesh that models the buffer and the canister has been created and<br />

a number of calculations that simulate different rock shears have been performed, see section<br />

16.2.4. Figure 17-2 shows examples of calculation results.<br />

<strong>Programme</strong><br />

There may be reason to further verify the modelled effect of a rock shear. The need for<br />

additional tests and possibilities for conducting such tests are being considered.<br />

Plastic strain<br />

+1.000e—01<br />

+9.000e—02<br />

+8.000e—02<br />

+7.000e—02<br />

+6.000e—02<br />

+5.000e—02<br />

+4.000e—02<br />

+3.000e—02<br />

+2.000e—02<br />

+1.000e—02<br />

+0.000e+00<br />

Average stress (kPa)<br />

+4.416e+04<br />

+4.000e+04<br />

+3.600e+04<br />

+3.200e+04<br />

+2.800e+04<br />

+2.400e+04<br />

+2.000e+04<br />

+1.600e+04<br />

+1.200e+04<br />

+8.000e+03<br />

+4.000e+03<br />

+0.000e+00<br />

Figure 17-2. Examples of results from a calculation with 20 cm eccentric rock shear (density at<br />

water saturation 2,000 kg/m 3 and shear rate 1 m/s). Deformed structure (upper left), plastic strain<br />

in the cast iron insert (upper right), plastic strain in the buffer (lower left) and average stress<br />

(kPa) in the buffer (lower right).<br />

210 RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> <strong>2004</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!