10.11.2014 Views

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

simulating the repository environment in the laboratory. Oxygen is present in the air around<br />

us, but in the anoxic experiments the partial pressure of oxygen must be virtually zero. This is<br />

difficult to achieve in practice. Traces of oxygen tend to diffuse in due to the big difference in<br />

partial pressure outside and inside the experiment. Despite flushing with inert gas or the use of<br />

glove boxes filled with inert gas, the conditions in the experiments tend to be more oxidizing<br />

than in the repository.<br />

In order to be able to distinguish the effect of radiolytic oxidation caused by radiation in the<br />

experiments with spent fuel, it is necessary to reduce the influence of oxygen contamination.<br />

Only then is it possible to observe the influence of different reducing components. The results<br />

of experiments involving dissolution of a fuel rod in an argon atmosphere are reported in /15-6/.<br />

The use of metal tubes, glass-metal welds and better seals in the measurement system reduced<br />

the inward diffusion of contaminating oxygen. It could then be observed how radiolysis alone<br />

contributes to an oxidative dissolution of the fuel. After 280 days, two small metal foils of iron<br />

and copper were added to simulate the influence of the canister’s different materials. The fission<br />

products caesium, molybdenum and strontium continued to leach out (Figure 15-2), while the<br />

concentrations of uranium, neptunium and technetium fell. This shows that despite the strong<br />

radiation, the contact with iron creates reducing conditions.<br />

Two other ways of avoiding contamination with atmospheric oxygen have also been tried:<br />

use of an oxygen trap and inert gas under high pressure /15-7/. In the first case, an oxygen<br />

trap with saturated iron(II) carbonate solution was placed in the same closed inert-gas-flushed<br />

space as the test vessel /15-8/. In the second case, a sturdy and well-sealed pressure vessel was<br />

used, where any leakage can easily be checked via changes in the pressure. No leakage may be<br />

tolerated, since tests have shown that even if inert gas flows out of the vessel it is possible for<br />

oxygen to diffuse in upstream /15-9/.<br />

The term “reducing conditions” should not be used indiscriminately for all experiments with<br />

hydrogen-saturated solutions. For even though the hydrogen is potentially highly reducing, it<br />

is also kinetically inert at normal temperatures. This, along with the importance of the negative<br />

redox potentials measured in hydrogen solutions, is discussed in /15-9/.<br />

30<br />

6x10 —6<br />

Sr-90<br />

Tc-99<br />

25<br />

Cs-137<br />

Mo-100<br />

Concentration, ppb<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

U-238<br />

U-238<br />

4x10 —6<br />

(U)<br />

mol/L<br />

2x10 —6<br />

5<br />

Addition of iron<br />

and copper foil<br />

0<br />

0 100 200 300 400 500<br />

Leaching time, days<br />

0<br />

Figure 15-2. Measured concentrations of 238 U and the fission products 137 Cs, 90 Sr, 99 Tc and 100 Mo<br />

as a function of leaching time. The concentrations of 238 U are shown on the right-hand axis in<br />

mol/l. The vertical dashed line shows the time for introduction of iron and copper electrodes<br />

(each with a surface area of about 30 mm 2 ).<br />

172 RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> <strong>2004</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!