10.11.2014 Views

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

17.2.24 Radionuclide transport – advection<br />

The main function of the buffer is to guarantee that diffusion is the dominant transport mechanism<br />

around the canisters. With an MX-80 buffer with a water-saturated density of 2,000 kg/m 3 ,<br />

the transport capacity for diffusion is at least 10,000 times higher than that for advection.<br />

17.2.25 Radionuclide transport – diffusion<br />

The transport of radionuclides through the buffer is mediated by different diffusion mechanisms.<br />

It has been established that certain cations can have high diffusivities (be transported more<br />

efficiently). One possible explanation for this phenomenon is the theory of surface diffusion.<br />

The process is handled in the safety assessment by assigning higher diffusivity values to<br />

caesium, strontium and radium.<br />

When bentonite has such a high density that the electrical double layers between two planes<br />

overlap, a phenomenon known as anion exclusion occurs. Anions cannot penetrate into the<br />

interlamellar pores due to the electrostatic forces between the negatively charged surfaces and<br />

the anion. Anion exclusion significantly reduces the porosity available for diffusion of anions.<br />

The effect of anion exclusion becomes less at high salinities, and in crushed rock/bentonite<br />

mixtures it is negligible.<br />

Conclusions in RD&D 2001 and its review<br />

SKI questions whether it is correct to describe the surface diffusion process by postulating<br />

higher diffusivity values for caesium, strontium and radium, see also section 17.2.26.<br />

Newfound knowledge since RD&D 2001<br />

A number of laboratory tests have been carried out to investigate in detail various processes<br />

that influence ion diffusion in bentonite clay. Anion diffusion in bentonite clay compacted to<br />

different dry densities has been investigated /17-21/. The results indicate that anion diffusion<br />

in bentonite clay consists of two processes, a fast one and a slow one. The explanation that has<br />

been proposed is that the rapid diffusion process is diffusion between the bentonite layers, while<br />

the slow one is diffusion between the bentonite particles, where the anions to some degree sorb<br />

to edge positions on the montmorillonite and/or to other minerals in the bentonite.<br />

Diffusion in bentonite clay has been investigated in two in situ experiments in the Äspö HRL:<br />

Chemlab and Lot. Chemlab is a down-the-hole laboratory probe in which diffusion tests have<br />

been conducted with cations (Cs + , Sr 2+ and Co 2+ ) and anions (I – and TcO 4– ) in bentonite and with<br />

natural groundwater. The water was taken from a fracture in the same borehole in which the test<br />

was performed /17-22/. The redox-sensitive pertechnate ion (TcO 4– ) diffused unreduced, despite<br />

the fact that it should have been reduced thermodynamically and precipitated as TcO 2·nH 2 O<br />

/17-23/. The technetium activity was much higher at certain places, however. The activity peaks<br />

are attributed to iron-bearing minerals where Tc(VII) has been reduced to Tc(IV) and precipitated.<br />

The cations Sr 2+ , Cs + and Co 2+ , as well as the anion I – , behaved in the same way as in a<br />

laboratory test.<br />

In the Lot tests /17-24/, cylindrical bentonite blocks were placed around a copper tube in a<br />

four-metre deep vertical borehole. The hole was then sealed and the bentonite blocks were left<br />

in the hole for one year, five years or a much longer time than five years. When the bentonite is<br />

water-saturated, the copper tube is heated to simulate the energy that is liberated by radioactive<br />

decay in the spent nuclear fuel. Bentonite that has been doped with radioactive caesium and<br />

cobalt was placed in one of the lowermost blocks. When the test was concluded, the activitycontaining<br />

bentonite block was taken to a radiological laboratory, where the activity distribution<br />

in the block was determined. The activity distribution was as expected from laboratory studies<br />

for both the cations.<br />

224 RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> <strong>2004</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!