10.11.2014 Views

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A thorough overview has been done of stress measurement methods and methods for evaluation<br />

of stress measurements in the light of the work with stress description in the site models /19-24<br />

to 19-28/.<br />

The strategy for developing site descriptive models was first tested on data from Äspö /19-29/,<br />

and was then applied to Laxemar /19-30/ and in the so-called version 0 reports for the site<br />

investigations /19-31, 19-32/. The strategy is also applied in the continued site modelling.<br />

The importance of the stress paths for e.g. loading and movements in the intact rock has been<br />

described systematically in an overview study and compared with criteria for different modes<br />

of failure that can occur around underground openings in the repository /19-33/. The study<br />

particularly shows that light support, for example from the tunnel backfill, can be of importance<br />

in preventing the occurrence and growth of brittle failure.<br />

Detailed characterization and modelling of stresses and deformations has been carried out in<br />

the ongoing Apse experiment in the Äspö HRL /19-34/. The results are being compared with<br />

measurement data.<br />

During blasting of the Apse tunnel, detailed convergence measurements were performed in<br />

nearly fracture-free rock. A set of back calculations of the convergence movements has been<br />

carried out /19-35/. If it is assumed in the numerical model that the elasticity properties of the<br />

rock are close to those that have been measured for intact rock, the back calculations confirm<br />

the predicted stresses: σ 1 = 30 MPa, σ 2 = σ 3 = 10 MPa, where σ 1 is horizontal and perpendicular<br />

to the tunnel. Figure 19-3 shows that the agreement is good and thereby also verifies that<br />

the response to the rock excavation is primarily elastic, which is expected in view of the low<br />

fracture density in the measurement section.<br />

0.006<br />

0.005<br />

Measured displacements<br />

plus calculated<br />

convergence before<br />

measurement<br />

Convergence (m)<br />

0.004<br />

0.003<br />

0.002<br />

Examine 3D<br />

E-modulus 55 GPa<br />

Poisson’s ratio 0.26<br />

Calculated deformation<br />

before first convergence<br />

measurement<br />

Measured displacements<br />

0.001<br />

0<br />

−11<br />

−9.8<br />

−8.8<br />

−7.8<br />

−6.8<br />

−5.8<br />

−4.8<br />

−3.8<br />

−2.8<br />

−1.8<br />

−0.8<br />

0.17<br />

1.17<br />

2.17<br />

3.17<br />

4.17<br />

Distance to tunnel front (m)<br />

Figure 19-3. Convergence measurement of the Apse tunnel. The pins were installed at a distance<br />

of between 0.3 and 0.5 metre from the tunnel front. The principle of convergence measurement<br />

and the positioning of the pins in the measurement section are shown at the left. The decrease<br />

in the distance between studs 3 and 4 as the distance to the tunnel front increases (Measured<br />

displacements) is shown at the right. The calculated deformations, “Examine3D”, apply to a<br />

case where stress field and elastic properties have been determined by back calculation to provide<br />

the best possible total agreement with the measurement values, corrected to include calculated<br />

convergence movement before the first measurement.<br />

250 RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> <strong>2004</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!