10.11.2014 Views

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Conclusions in RD&D 2001 and its review<br />

SKI points out the importance of the influence of saline groundwater on the hydraulic properties<br />

of the backfill. Future changes in the salinity of the groundwater must also be taken into<br />

account, see also Kasam’s viewpoints in section 18.2.21.<br />

Newfound knowledge since RD&D 2001<br />

In principle, the backfill works in the same way as the buffer, see section 17.2.15. Saline<br />

groundwater will, however, have a greater relative influence on the physical properties of<br />

the backfill, since the density of the montmorillonite fraction is lower in the backfill. Current<br />

compaction technology for backfill materials in a deposition tunnel does not provide sufficiently<br />

high montmorillonite density to meet the safety margins under sea water conditions.<br />

<strong>Programme</strong><br />

See section 17.2.15. For backfill materials, the development work will be focused on emplacement<br />

technique to increase the montmorillonite density, see section 18.1.6, and testing of<br />

different clay materials.<br />

18.2.14 Ion exchange/sorption<br />

Ion exchange from sodium to calcium leads to similar effects as high salinity in the groundwater<br />

(see section 17.2.16) in a backfill material with a low content of swelling clay, i.e. the pore<br />

geometry in the backfill material is altered and the backfill risks losing its swelling and sealing<br />

properties.<br />

Conclusions in RD&D 2001 and its review<br />

SKI maintains that <strong>SKB</strong> should evaluate what saline groundwaters mean for the repository.<br />

Newfound knowledge since RD&D 2001<br />

See section 17.2.16.<br />

<strong>Programme</strong><br />

See section 17.2.16.<br />

18.2.15 Montmorillonite transformation<br />

What is said about montmorillonite transformation in the buffer is largely applicable to the<br />

backfill as well, see section 17.2.17. The boundary conditions exhibit certain differences,<br />

however. The temperature in the backfill is lower and less iron is available, which would lead to<br />

slower transformation. On the other hand, the density may be lower and the quantity of cement<br />

may be higher, which could lead to more rapid transformation.<br />

Conclusions in RD&D 2001 and its review<br />

In Kasam’s opinion, <strong>SKB</strong> should set a limit on how much potassium the crushed rock may<br />

contain.<br />

Newfound knowledge since RD&D 2001<br />

See section 17.2.17.<br />

RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> <strong>2004</strong> 237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!