10.11.2014 Views

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

These phenomena have been studied both in basic laboratory tests and in model tests on<br />

different scales. The former were done either with constant flow rate or constant water pressure<br />

in drilled holes with a diameter of 2–4 millimetres through 5–10 centimetre long bentonite<br />

pellets. The results showed that only very low water flow rates or very low water pressures<br />

could be stopped by the bentonite. Since these tests can be regarded as conservative extremes,<br />

model tests were performed, first on a scale of 1:10 and then on full scale. The result of the<br />

model tests on a scale of 1:10, where the gap at the top of the simulated distance block was<br />

four millimetres, was that a pressure increase rate of about 200 kPa/h was the upper limit below<br />

which piping did not occur, but also that the water fill-up rate was an important parameter.<br />

When the test was scaled up to full scale, however, the upper limit was only 5 kPa/h, since the<br />

gap there was four centimetres. At the same time, the leakage rate during fill-up was very great.<br />

In other words, the requirements cannot be met without an engineering solution, and a collar<br />

was applied to the “rock” in the most recent test. The collar was attached to the “rock” and its<br />

annular disc was made so big that it closed off the gap between the “rock” and the spacer block<br />

and extended another five centimetres into the spacer block. This arrangement could cope with<br />

50 kPa/h up to a pressure of 2 MPa without piping occurring and without any leakage occurring<br />

before fill-up was finished.<br />

The conclusion is thus that a gap on the order of several centimetres between the roof and the<br />

distance block cannot handle the base scenario without an engineering solution, but also that it<br />

should be fully possible to either devise solutions that meet the requirements or to make spacer<br />

blocks with smaller gaps against the rock (for example, wedge-shaped three-piece blocks).<br />

Independent tests have been conducted within the Colloid Project, as well as field tests at Äspö.<br />

The results clearly show that spontaneous dispersal of montmorillonite from a bentonite buffer<br />

does not occur if the calcium concentration in the groundwater exceeds 1 mM. The results<br />

complement and confirm previous investigations both qualitatively and quantitatively /17-19/.<br />

The problem of spontaneous release of montmorillonite is thereby probably reduced to the<br />

concentration of divalent ions in the groundwater.<br />

<strong>Programme</strong><br />

The tests with piping and erosion for KBS-3H will continue both on a small scale and on full<br />

scale to gain a better understanding of these processes. If it proves difficult to guarantee that<br />

piping will not occur, a series of erosion tests must be done for the purpose of being able to<br />

estimate the quantity of eroding bentonite in different situations.<br />

Quantitative modelling of a possible removal of montmorillonite colloids from the buffer is<br />

planned.<br />

17.2.20 Radiation-induced montmorillonite transformation<br />

Montmorillonite in the buffer can be broken down by gamma radiation. The result is a decrease<br />

in the montmorillonite concentration. Experiments have shown that the accumulated radiation<br />

dose to which the bentonite will be exposed in a deep repository does not cause any measurable<br />

changes in the montmorillonite concentration.<br />

17.2.21 Radiolysis of pore water<br />

Gamma radiation that penetrates through the canister can decompose pore water by radiolysis,<br />

forming OH radicals, hydrogen, oxygen and several other components. The oxygen is consumed<br />

rapidly by oxidation processes which affect the redox potential, while the hydrogen is transported<br />

away. The canister’s wall thickness is, however, sufficient so that the effect of gamma<br />

radiolysis on the outside is negligible, see section 17.1.4.<br />

222 RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> <strong>2004</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!