27.11.2014 Views

Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home

Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home

Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

92<br />

Vladimir Nabokov<br />

upon subject matter which was, and still is, strongly taboo in Western<br />

culture is, clearly, a flamboyant understatement.<br />

The novel’s notoriety was surely enhanced by the two movie<br />

versions that have been made of it. The first, in 1962, was directed<br />

by Stanley Kubrick and starred James Mason as Humbert Humbert<br />

and Sue Lyon as Dolores, with Shelley Winters playing Charlotte<br />

Haze and a madcap performance by Peter Sellers as Quilty. The 1997<br />

version by director Adrian Lyne had Jeremy Irons and the 15-yearold<br />

Dominique Swain in the two major roles, and Melanie Griffith<br />

as Charlotte. Frank Langella played Quilty in a performance entirely<br />

different from Sellers’, but equally wild. Nabokov himself actually<br />

wrote a script for the earlier film, but Kubrick chose not to use it, a<br />

decision that Nabokov himself eventually concluded was wise.<br />

Since Humbert Humbert is the sole narrator of the book, we see<br />

all its characters and action through the eyes of a pedophile, and this<br />

adds an important level of nuance and complexity to Lolita. Moreover,<br />

Humbert is telling his story from a jail cell to justify his obsession and<br />

to try to make the case that he is not a criminal, much less a pervert,<br />

just a devoted lover with a particularly rich imagination. Thus, he<br />

constantly addresses the readers of Lolita as “Ladies and gentlemen<br />

of the jury” (Lolita 11). He argues that “the majority of sex offenders<br />

that hanker for some . . . girl child, are innocuous, inadequate, passive,<br />

timid strangers who merely ask the community to allow them to<br />

pursue their practically harmless, so-called aberrant behavior, their<br />

little hot wet private acts of sexual deviation without the police and<br />

society cracking down upon them. . . . We are unhappy, mild, dog-eyed<br />

gentlemen. . . . emphatically, no killers are we. Poets never kill” (89).<br />

And yet, as we noted earlier, Humbert does kill his rival Quilty. But<br />

is he a “poet”?<br />

What makes Humbert’s narration problematic is that, poet or not,<br />

he is a consummate wordsmith: learned, witty, full of arguments and<br />

examples that support or justify his obsession. His words are always<br />

fascinating, even mesmerizing (Nabokov even considered naming the<br />

character “Mesmer Mesmer”). Consider just the opening lines of his<br />

narration:<br />

Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul.<br />

Lo-lee-ta: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps<br />

down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!