27.11.2014 Views

Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home

Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home

Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82<br />

D.H. Lawrence<br />

what is left of the natural world, that “greenwood” into which E. M.<br />

Forster in Maurice dispatches his drop-out bourgeois with another<br />

game keeper. He is related to Lawrence’s Indians and gipsies (The<br />

Virgin and the Gipsy was written only a short time before the novel),<br />

but the difference is important; he has found his way out of the white<br />

consciousness. This is why Lawrence makes him an educated man<br />

and an ex-officer, and why he gives him two dialects, middle class and<br />

peasant. To the latter belong the famous four-letter words; spoken in<br />

the Chatterley dining room they are nasty, here they are “part of the<br />

natural flow” (Phoenix II, 570). Mellors is also part of that flow; we see<br />

that when he pushes Chatterley’s mechanical chair as well as when he<br />

goes about his gamekeeper’s business; we see it in his difference from<br />

his social superiors. He inhabits his world alone and chaste; when he<br />

has to move into Connie’s worn-out world he feels the “bruise of the<br />

war” (V) but dreads rebirth; for that is what his relation with her must<br />

involve. As for Connie, she has to abandon the impurity of Michaelis,<br />

whose way is only down and out, for the way of Mellors, which is a<br />

passage through the gates of life and death (Etruscan Places, which also<br />

celebrates this mystical journey, is contemporary with the novel).<br />

Mellors might have been a lay figure, representing Lawrencian<br />

opinions; he calls his little daughter a “false little bitch” for crying<br />

dishonestly (VI) and holds the right views about marriage. In many<br />

ways he differs little from Dukes, with his prophesying of the end:<br />

“Our old show will come flop; our civilization is going to fall. It’s<br />

going down to the bottomless pit, down the chasm. And believe<br />

me, the only bridge across the chasm will be the phallus” (VII). But<br />

Connie, though moved by this talk of “the resurrection of the body”<br />

and a “democracy of touch” finds more than words in Mellors; even<br />

as she deeply senses “the end of all things,” she is capable of receiving<br />

“in her womb” the shock of the vision of the gamekeeper’s body as he<br />

washed: “the pure, delicate, white loins, the bones showing a little, and<br />

the sense of aloneness” (VI). She goes to him not in frustrated desire<br />

but in the need to be reborn in the last days—a harsh ecstasy, unlike<br />

that of Chatterley’s surrender of his solar plexus (no stimulus possible<br />

to his lumbar ganglia) to Mrs. Bolton.<br />

What follows is Connie’s initiation and mystic rebirth, as in the<br />

original plot of Apocalypse; and Lawrence is suggesting that the<br />

novel itself mimes this process, for “it can inform and lead into new<br />

places the flow of our sympathetic consciousness, and it can lead our

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!