27.11.2014 Views

Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home

Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home

Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

94<br />

Vladimir Nabokov<br />

and discrete when it comes to depicting the mechanics of physical<br />

passion. Lolita is full of colorful, even lurid, prose, but none of it is<br />

devoted to describing acts of lust. Even Humbert Humbert observes,<br />

immediately after the first time he and Dolores make love, “I am<br />

not concerned with so-called ‘sex’ at all. Anybody can imagine those<br />

elements of animality” (Lolita 136). Clearly, Lolita is not a book about<br />

sex; it is a book about a man who is sexually obsessed. This leads to<br />

a second, worthwhile, query: Is Vladimir Nabokov a pervert, a pedophile,<br />

a sex maniac, or what?<br />

This is a simple question, but one that opens the door to an<br />

important set of issues in literary study. It is easy to forget that sometimes<br />

readers, particularly relatively inexperienced readers, habitually<br />

confuse the narrative voice with the authorial perspective. (This is<br />

perhaps one reason such readers tend to refer to the author, and often<br />

the characters, of literary works as “they,” as in “What do they mean<br />

at the end of Hamlet by calling him a ‘sweet prince’?”) The difference<br />

between the narrative mask and the authorial consciousness seems so<br />

obvious to more experienced readers that we often forget how crucial<br />

the discovery of that gap is to literary understanding. Lolita is an ideal<br />

book to teach, or reinforce, that lesson. Initially, the novel’s narrative<br />

voice is beguiling and seems to be presenting a strong legalistic case<br />

justifying Humbert’s lust for Dolores. Because Humbert is trying so<br />

hard, with such intellectual heavy artillery, to suggest that his thoughts<br />

and actions are not evil, it can be easy at first to imagine that his<br />

creator is making that case.<br />

This confusion can be amplified by the fact that in some aspects<br />

of their lives, Humbert Humbert and Vladimir Nabokov seem<br />

similar: both are European and cosmopolitan, living in a more simple,<br />

suburban America. Both have been college teachers. Both are multilingual,<br />

and both are enormously widely read. But a second look at the<br />

biographies of the fictional hero, and his real creator, make it very clear<br />

that they are wholly different people. Humbert is from Switzerland,<br />

Nabokov from Russia. The former’s parents were the proprietors of a<br />

resort hotel, the latter’s were intellectual Russian aristocrats. Humbert<br />

Humbert comes to America because he has inherited a business<br />

from his uncle; Vladimir Nabokov came in flight from Nazis who<br />

were overrunning Europe in 1940. Humbert entered into marriage<br />

only to be near the child daughter of his short-lived wife; Nabokov<br />

married Vera Slonin in 1925, they had a son Dmitri, and remained

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!