Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home
Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home
Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
58<br />
William Shakespeare<br />
father being “at the same time John’s grandfather” (460)—a situation<br />
that casts John in a role equivalent to father, intermediary between<br />
Freud and his actual father/grandfather.<br />
But the context in which the dream is discussed betrays the<br />
paternal ghost; recalling the figure of Brutus seems to evoke the<br />
specter of problematic relationships with the father. The dream of<br />
annihilating P., coming at the end of the section on “Calculation in<br />
Dreams” in Chapter Six, launches discussion of a series of dreams<br />
about fathers that extends through the three following sections. The<br />
pattern, considered in relation to Freud himself—and after all, it is he<br />
who “played Brutus”—suggests that John, the Caesar of his childhood,<br />
the elder, superior figure who evokes hostility, is a surrogate for Freud’s<br />
father, whom he scrupulously protects from the taint of Oedipal accusations.<br />
In his essay on “Screen Memories,” 11 Freud acknowledges<br />
the unreliability as facts of childhood memories: “It may indeed be<br />
questioned whether we have any memories at all from our childhood:<br />
memories relating to our childhood may be all that we possess” (322).<br />
Childhood memories signify in different, more symbolic registers<br />
than that of pure narrative history. A memory of dramatic play would<br />
be particularly resonant, not only because each participant takes on a<br />
role additional to his own, but because subsequent encounters with<br />
the play-text become impacted to produce one’s total current response<br />
to the play, which then colors any memory of the original event. The<br />
resonance for Freud of Julius Caesar (a textual memory evidently<br />
embracing the enacted passage from Schiller) is evinced in the way<br />
the play serves as a subtext to this portion of The Interpretation of<br />
Dreams. Noting the formal and thematic correspondences furthers<br />
a specific understanding of how Freud connects the phenomenon of<br />
ambivalence with the child’s (here the son’s) relation to the father, a<br />
connection that later forms the foundation for Totem and Taboo.<br />
Freud’s dream of playing “the part of Brutus” is followed by one<br />
dreamed by a patient “who had lost his father six years earlier.” The<br />
dream involves a railway accident in which the father’s “head was<br />
compressed from side to side” (461) and the dreamer’s subsequent vision<br />
of his father with a wound above one eyebrow. Freud makes a connection<br />
between the dream and the patient’s dissatisfaction with a bust of<br />
his father newly rendered by an artist. The dreamer’s—and Freud’s 12 —<br />
concern with statuary parallels that of Shakespeare’s Romans, who