Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home
Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home
Bloom's Literary Themes - ymerleksi - home
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Poetry of Anne Sexton 201<br />
explain why. Among the most convincing retellings is Juliet Mitchell’s<br />
in Psychoanalysis and Feminism, in which she urges us to construe the<br />
Oedipus complex as more than a term for normal childhood sexual<br />
conflicts revolving around intense attachments to the parents, by<br />
which measure the significance attributed to it by psychoanalysis may<br />
indeed seem inflated. According to Mitchell, the Oedipus complex<br />
designates a set of internal and external acts through which every<br />
person is initiated into the cultural order; it is not only “a metaphor<br />
for the psychic structure of the bourgeois nuclear family under<br />
Viennese capitalism,” but “a law that describes the way in which all<br />
[Western] culture is acquired by each individual.” 3<br />
Critics have been endlessly irritated by the recurring themes of<br />
infancy and the relationship to the mother and father in Anne Sexton’s<br />
poetry. Beginning with her first teacher, John Holmes, Sexton has been<br />
accused of childishness and of infantile preoccupations. She insisted<br />
that these themes were at the heart of the matter—and not only her<br />
matter, but by implication, everyone’s. “Grow up,” said the decorous<br />
world of poetry to her throughout her career; “Stop playing in the crib<br />
and the sandbox—and especially stop sniveling about your childhood.”<br />
Her poetic reply frightened the critics who disliked her work—most of<br />
them transparently opposed to psychoanalytic theory—for that reply<br />
asserted again and again that grown woman though she might be,<br />
successful professional though she might be, the process of working<br />
out her relationship to her parents and her childhood was a life’s work.<br />
Nor did she permit the poetic community to suppose it was only her<br />
life’s work. If we acknowledged it as hers, and as the legitimate domain<br />
of poetry, then we would have to come to terms with the possibility<br />
that it might be our own lifelong process as well. Blind as Teiresias, she<br />
revealed to all of us the truth about Laius’ murder. As Bruno Bettelheim<br />
writes in Freud and Man’s Soul, “we encounter in Teiresias the idea that<br />
having one’s sight turned away from the external world and directed<br />
inward—toward the inner nature of things—gives true knowledge and<br />
permits understanding of what is hidden and needs to be known.” 4<br />
But it is not Teiresias, finally, with whom I identify Anne Sexton.<br />
Rather, it is Oedipus, and specifically the Oedipus of Freud and Man’s<br />
Soul. Bettelheim attempts yet another re-reading of Freud’s Oedipus,<br />
and I find it the most moving and accessible that contemporary<br />
psychoanalysis has offered to an audience larger than its own members.<br />
Freud’s Oedipus, through Bettelheim, takes on the luminosity of the