30.12.2014 Views

Caspian Report - Issue: 08 - Fall 2014

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NINO KALANDADZE<br />

64<br />

There are benefits for supplier and<br />

transit countries as well, most notably<br />

for the South Caucasian non-<br />

EU, non-NATO member states such<br />

as Azerbaijan and Georgia. These<br />

post-Soviet states were dependent<br />

on Russian pipelines throughout<br />

the Soviet Union both for exporting<br />

and importing gas for domestic consumption.<br />

This significantly undermining<br />

their political and economic<br />

autonomy, and provided Moscow<br />

with additional leverage. This situation<br />

underwent a major shift with<br />

the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil<br />

pipeline, which delivers Azerbaijani<br />

oil through Georgia to Turkey. 29 In<br />

addition, since 2006, Georgia’s domestic<br />

needs have been met almost<br />

exclusively by gas from Azerbaijan,<br />

with no further reliance upon Russian<br />

supply. 30 The Southern Gas<br />

Corridor will further contribute to<br />

the region’s political and economic<br />

independence. Azerbaijan, as the<br />

supplier, will reach European markets,<br />

while Georgia and Turkey will<br />

benefit from “Russia-free” supplies<br />

as well as substantial revenues as<br />

transit countries. Moreover, since<br />

good infrastructure and unimpeded<br />

delivery will be of major importance<br />

to all parties involved, the construction<br />

of a new corridor will inevitably<br />

require even closer cooperation between<br />

the Georgia, Azerbaijan and<br />

Turkey on the one hand and the EU<br />

on the other. This can only strengthen<br />

regional political and economic<br />

ties, boosting further engagement<br />

by western Allies in the region,<br />

strengthening their economic and<br />

political independence from Moscow.<br />

This represents great opportunities<br />

for European energy security, as<br />

well as the for long term economic<br />

security and stability of the region.<br />

However, there are also risks. The<br />

Caucasus region is currently host<br />

to several political, economic and<br />

ethnic instabilities. Most importantly<br />

the so-called frozen conflicts,<br />

military occupation and substantial<br />

uncontrolled armed presence of a<br />

foreign country make the region<br />

particularly vulnerable and susceptible<br />

to further destabilisation. Any<br />

kind of escalation has significant<br />

potential to jeopardise regional stability<br />

and the entire energy security<br />

concept.<br />

C. THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND<br />

ITS SECURITY CHALLENGES<br />

The Caucasus enjoys a strategic location<br />

at the crossroads between<br />

Europe and Asia, between the <strong>Caspian</strong><br />

and Black Seas. Consequently, it<br />

attracts interest from different parts<br />

of the world, most notably from big<br />

players such as the US, EU, Turkey<br />

and Russia. The latter has by far the<br />

most significant impact on the post-<br />

Soviet countries. As outlined above,<br />

the region’s specific importance is<br />

increasing with Europe’s growing<br />

awareness of the importance of securing<br />

reliable, stable and diversified<br />

delivery of hydrocarbons on the<br />

one hand, and the Caucasus’ crucial<br />

role as a source and transit route<br />

in this process on the other. Russia,<br />

however, perceives any further political<br />

engagement by the West in<br />

its “near abroad” zone, 31 together<br />

with the attempts to locate alterna-<br />

29.<br />

http://www.bp.com/en_az/caspian/operationsprojects/pipelines/BTC.html<br />

30.<br />

MFA Georgia, http://www.mfa.gov.ge/index.phplang_id=ENG&sec_id=748<br />

31.<br />

A term that first emerged in Russian to describe Russia’s relations with the other former<br />

republics of the Soviet Union underlining Russia’s superiority and the existence of a an<br />

unequal relationship. See also http://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/hip/us/hip_us_<br />

pearsonhighered/samplechapter/0205189938.pdf

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!