30.12.2014 Views

Caspian Report - Issue: 08 - Fall 2014

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

United States<br />

Vice President<br />

Joe Biden speaks<br />

during a joint<br />

press conference<br />

with Ukraine’s<br />

President Petro<br />

Poroshenko.<br />

tive opinion of the ICJ in the Kosovo<br />

case, at paragraph 81). 5<br />

Modern law and the international<br />

practice concur that it is not valid to<br />

isolate the principle of self-determination<br />

of peoples from its historical<br />

context of colonialism and transpose<br />

it into a justification for a right<br />

to unilateral secession.<br />

2.2 THE KOSOVO PRECEDENT<br />

International politics and jurisprudence<br />

(for example, the secession of<br />

Quebec as addressed by the Court of<br />

Supreme Justice of Canada), nonetheless<br />

confirm the political reality<br />

of declarations of independence and<br />

acts of unilateral secession under<br />

the self-determination principle in<br />

contradiction with the domestic and<br />

international law, but without eventually<br />

affecting the de facto situation,<br />

namely the secession of states.<br />

Therefore, the notion of statehood<br />

is relevant in connection with two<br />

prevailing conceptions of international<br />

law: the constitutive theory,<br />

claiming that recognition by the<br />

international community is the essential<br />

criterion of statehood; and<br />

the declarative theory, claiming that<br />

statehood is a legal status that does<br />

not depend on recognition. 6<br />

Even in the event of a high level of<br />

international recognition of an act of<br />

secession, this does not confirm the<br />

international lawfulness of such a<br />

political act. Moreover, when secession<br />

occurs in contradiction with jus<br />

75<br />

CASPIAN REPORT, FALL <strong>2014</strong><br />

5.<br />

The international law commission of the UN established that if a declaration of independence<br />

is issued in breach of the jus cogens principle (generally accepted international law principles),<br />

the so declared independence is considered illegal and the international community has the<br />

obligation to refrain from recognizing the political independence act. In the same respect, the<br />

Vienna Convention on the law of treaties (Art.52), declared as void the treaties concluded as<br />

a result of use of force or threat to use force and in contradiction with the international law<br />

principles in the Charter of the United Nations.<br />

6.<br />

The view is based on the Montevideo Convention of 1933 on the rights and obligations of states<br />

that established the defining criteria of statehood: 1) a permanent population; 2) a defined<br />

territory; 3) a government; and 4) a capacity to enter into relations with other states.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!