30.12.2014 Views

Caspian Report - Issue: 08 - Fall 2014

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

egional security, which, for obvious<br />

reasons, cannot be resolved by<br />

the countries affected on their own<br />

Along with political and economic<br />

engagement by Western countries,<br />

there is a need for a clear and effective<br />

Western policy, particularly on<br />

conflict resolution. This approach<br />

needs to be understood by the Western<br />

allies as a strategic challenge and<br />

an intermediary means of securing<br />

their own long term energy security.<br />

In that sense, even if there are<br />

no immediate and effective means<br />

to promptly resolve conflicts in<br />

South Caucasus, the fragility stemming<br />

from unresolved conflicts and<br />

its direct causal link to securing the<br />

regional and European energy security<br />

cannot be ignored. It must be<br />

addressed in a more specific manner.<br />

In that sense, as a short to medium<br />

term approach, NATO’s could<br />

accelerate Georgia’s membership<br />

(as Azerbaijan is not seeking any<br />

integration into the Alliance at this<br />

stage). In the long run however, in<br />

order for the SGC to be successfully<br />

launched and implemented, conflict<br />

resolution in South Caucasus should<br />

become an indispensible component<br />

of the EU’s broader energy security<br />

package.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The EU’s decision to intensify talks<br />

on energy supply diversification<br />

and the Southern Gas Corridor is a<br />

more than welcome initiative. With<br />

the potential to deliver 10 bcm to<br />

South Europe, and bypassing Russia,<br />

the SGC provides an excellent<br />

opportunity for Europe to diversify<br />

its supply and reduce Gazprom’s<br />

virtual monopoly in the short to<br />

medium term. With the possibility<br />

of expanding the pipeline to include<br />

other Central Asian and potentially<br />

Iranian sources, Europe’s long term<br />

energy security could also benefit.<br />

There is also an undeniable political<br />

and economic benefit to the supply<br />

and transit countries, such as Azerbaijan,<br />

Georgia and Turkey. However,<br />

since the whole scenario may<br />

be seen by Russia as a direct threat<br />

to its strategic economic and political<br />

interests, the security deficit in<br />

South Caucasus, in particular the<br />

unresolved conflicts, may become a<br />

major threat to this project. Therefore,<br />

effective measures need to be<br />

taken by the EU and NATO in order<br />

to guarantee the successful implementation<br />

of the project, in order to<br />

secure its diversified energy supply.<br />

While short-term steps need to be<br />

taken to observe the security situation<br />

in the region via establishing<br />

effective international observer missions,<br />

conflict resolution needs to<br />

become a central component of the<br />

EU’s broader energy security strategy,<br />

in order to safeguard the potential<br />

of the entire concept.<br />

67<br />

CASPIAN REPORT, FALL <strong>2014</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!