Rafiq-ul-Haramayn - Islamic School System - Dawat-e-Islami

Offences and their Expiations 227
as many Nafl Ṭawāf as possible. Even if he performs ‘Umraĥ,
according to some scholars, there is no harm in it. However, after
performing the rites of Hajj, everyone, i.e. the Mutamatte’, the Qārin
and the Mufrid can perform ‘Umraĥ.
Question 3: Those living in Arab outside Mīqāt such as Dammam
and Riyadh etc. are not allowed by government but they deceivingly
pass Mīqāt without Iḥrām and put on it after they have passed it and
then perform Hajj. What is the ruling for such people
Answer: It is impermissible to present oneself to be disgraced by
violating the law. In case of passing Mīqāt without Iḥrām, it would
be Wājib to return to Mīqāt and put on Iḥrām. If someone passed
Mīqāt without Iḥrām and performed Hajj or ‘Umraĥ, he will be
required to pay Dam besides being a sinner. If he has returned to
Mīqāt the same year before the commencement of the rites of Hajj
or ‘Umraĥ and has put on any type of Iḥrām, Dam will become void,
otherwise not.
Question 4: If someone has had Ḥalq done before performing the
Sa’ī of Hajj or ‘Umraĥ, and many days have passed since he did so,
what is the ruling
Answer: It is a Sunnaĥ for a Hajj-performing person to have Ḥalq
done before Sa’ī. That is, doing Sa’ī before Ḥalq is contrary to Sunnaĥ.
Therefore, if someone gets Ḥalq done before he has performed Sa’ī,
there is no harm in it. Even if many days have passed since he did
so, no expiation will be due because there is no time limit for Sa’ī.
However, if he has returned to his ‘country’ without performing
Sa’ī, Dam will be due in this case because of missing a Wājib. If he
comes back and performs Sa’ī, Dam will no longer remain Wājib.
However, it is still better for him to give Dam as it is in the interest
of the destitute.