20.03.2015 Views

Market Economics | Interest Rate Strategy - BNP PARIBAS ...

Market Economics | Interest Rate Strategy - BNP PARIBAS ...

Market Economics | Interest Rate Strategy - BNP PARIBAS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ebounded from -13% y/y to +8%. That has added<br />

another percentage point to headline RPI inflation.<br />

These developments have neutralised the<br />

contribution from housing and explain why RPI<br />

inflation is no longer below CPI inflation, but not why<br />

RPI inflation is now above CPI inflation. There are<br />

two main reasons for the near 2pp overshoot of RPI<br />

inflation relative to CPI inflation.<br />

The first is the formula effect i.e. the different<br />

averaging technique used in calculating the index.<br />

This is pretty stable through time at around 0.5pp,<br />

though currently accounts for 0.8pp of the differential.<br />

The other key contributor to the current gap is<br />

differences in weights between the two series. A<br />

good example of this is alcohol and tobacco. In the<br />

CPI this component has a weight of 4%, while it is<br />

more than double that (9.1%) in the RPI. Alcohol and<br />

tobacco inflation has been accelerating much more<br />

quickly than average over the last year, which, given<br />

the higher weight in the RPI helps to explain why RPI<br />

inflation has risen by more than CPI inflation.<br />

Which way now?<br />

We expect the gap between RPI and CPI inflation to<br />

narrow over the next 12 months to almost zero<br />

before widening again during 2012. More specifically,<br />

we expect a slowdown in the components such as<br />

alcohol that have accounted for much of the current<br />

gap between RPI and CPI inflation. Similarly, slowing<br />

house price inflation should bear down on RPI<br />

inflation, also contributing to the narrowing gap with<br />

CPI inflation.<br />

Thereafter we expect interest rate hikes during 2012<br />

to drive a wedge between the two series. Given the<br />

extremely low level of mortgage rates, a small<br />

interest rate hike is likely to have a big effect on RPI<br />

inflation.<br />

By way of example, the current level of the average<br />

mortgage rate according to the BoE is around 3½%.<br />

If the BoE were to hike Bank <strong>Rate</strong> to 2% by end-<br />

2012 (i.e. in line with market expectations), given the<br />

typical 70% passthrough to mortgage rates, that<br />

would represent a 30% increase in the MIPs<br />

component. In turn, that would add around 1.5pp to<br />

RPI inflation.<br />

from the MIPs component and hence the gap<br />

between RPI and CPI inflation. Unless Bank <strong>Rate</strong><br />

continues to rise for ever, that contribution from rising<br />

mortgage rates should at some point begin to fade –<br />

2014 in our view. Although we would envisage the<br />

gap narrowing at that point the formula effect should<br />

ensure that the gap between CPI and RPI inflation<br />

stabilises at around 0.5-0.75pp.<br />

Changes to the index<br />

One potential additional influence on this gap is the<br />

inclusion of some measure of house price inflation in<br />

the CPI. When this does happen, it should help to<br />

narrow the gap between RPI and CPI inflation.<br />

However, this change has been a long time coming<br />

and we gather is unlikely before 2012.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Over the longer run, the gap between RPI and CPI<br />

inflation is likely to narrow relative to current levels to<br />

reside closer to 0.5pp y/y. However, over the shorter<br />

term, the gap is likely to remain variable not least<br />

when the BoE eventually begins to raise Bank <strong>Rate</strong>.<br />

While this presents a potential headache for private<br />

sector pension funds in adjusting to the new rules,<br />

the adoption of the CPI for indexing public sector<br />

pensions was a master stroke by the Chancellor. It is<br />

likely to save the government around GBP 6bn per<br />

year by 2014-15.<br />

Clearly, there has been some discontent expressed<br />

by those who will be receiving less from their state<br />

pensions. However, few (if any) have acknowledged<br />

that this year’s increase was well above RPI inflation.<br />

September is the reference month for public sector<br />

pensions and benefits. Last September, RPI inflation<br />

was around -1½% y/y. However, because of the<br />

2.5% floor applied to public sector pensions this<br />

year’s increase was 4pp above RPI inflation. The<br />

bottom line is that public sector pension payments<br />

may well miss out on the boost to RPI inflation (of up<br />

to 4pp) once Bank <strong>Rate</strong> begins to rise. However, we<br />

suspect a spell of amnesia will block out memories of<br />

the RPI increase awarded in April 2010.<br />

Alan Clarke 16 July 2010<br />

<strong>Market</strong> Mover<br />

11<br />

www.Global<strong>Market</strong>s.bnpparibas.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!