Market Economics | Interest Rate Strategy - BNP PARIBAS ...
Market Economics | Interest Rate Strategy - BNP PARIBAS ...
Market Economics | Interest Rate Strategy - BNP PARIBAS ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
C is an active member of a pension scheme. He is<br />
continuing to accrue new rights. If he continues in<br />
pensionable service until he reaches normal pension<br />
age in (for example) 2015, revaluation will not apply.<br />
Once his pension is in payment, he will receive<br />
annual increases calculated in relation to CPI.<br />
D is an active member of a pension scheme. She will<br />
leave pensionable service in 2013, and will reach her<br />
normal pension age in 2020 and begin to receive her<br />
pension at that time. From 2013 to 2020 her rights<br />
will be revalued in relation to CPI. Once her pension<br />
is put into payment, she will receive annual increases<br />
calculated in relation to CPI.”<br />
Limited market impact of public pension<br />
indexation change…<br />
Public pension funds are believed to be in the order<br />
of around GBP 1trn (on a gilt-discounted basis) and,<br />
to the extent they are largely unfunded and<br />
unhedged, have limited impact on the RPI market<br />
with future PF obligations paid from public coffers.<br />
Local authorities, in contrast, do hold assets against<br />
their PF liabilities but are much smaller (20%) whilst<br />
their index-linked holdings are thought to be relatively<br />
small (< GBP 10bn). Future inflation hedging demand<br />
by these entities will most likely manifest itself in CPI<br />
space, not RPI.<br />
… But complexity over impact on private PFs<br />
The statutory minimum indexation benefit for PF<br />
members, also known as ‘general level of prices in<br />
Great Britain’ – published annually will use CPI not<br />
RPI from September 2010. The impact (on private<br />
pension fund solvency and RPI linked assets) is<br />
highly uncertain as different indexation rules apply to<br />
deferred pensions, pensioners and Guaranteed<br />
Minimum Pensions. Chart 1 illustrates the distribution<br />
of member types according to the Pensions<br />
Regulator. Equally important is the precise proportion<br />
of private sector defined-benefit (DB) pension funds<br />
that are linked to the ‘general level of prices’ without<br />
explicit reference to RPI (or LPI) which is currently<br />
unknown. Individual corporate pension funds will<br />
likely be examining their trust deeds and potentially<br />
holding trustee meetings to analyse the impact of the<br />
proposed changes on their members’ benefits and<br />
solvency levels.<br />
The DWP communiqué on 12 July does provide<br />
some clarity following Steve Webb’s written<br />
statement to the House of Commons regarding the<br />
shift to CPI. It illustrates that, with respect to deferred<br />
members, the proposed changes will only apply to<br />
future valuations. A report by actuaries Lane, Clarke<br />
& Peacock suggests most deferred pensions refer to<br />
the ‘general level of prices’ and thus would be<br />
impacted by the switch to CPI indexation but this is<br />
subject to reference in the Trust Deed. Pensioners<br />
Chart 1: Distribution of Member Types<br />
Pensioners,<br />
36%<br />
Active<br />
Members, 21%<br />
Deferred<br />
Members, 43%<br />
Active Members<br />
Deferred Members<br />
Pensioners<br />
Chart 2: Aggregate Private PF Assets,<br />
Liabilities, Surplus (PPF7800) and Potential<br />
Impact of Legislative Change<br />
200000<br />
150000<br />
100000<br />
50000<br />
0<br />
-50000<br />
-100000<br />
-150000<br />
-200000<br />
Surplus<br />
Assets £m Rhs<br />
Liabilities £m Rhs<br />
Potential Range<br />
of Impact on<br />
Agg. PF Surplus<br />
-250000<br />
Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11<br />
Sources: Purple Book 2009 The Pensions Regulator, <strong>BNP</strong> Paribas<br />
1200000<br />
1000000<br />
800000<br />
600000<br />
400000<br />
200000<br />
will switch to CPI indexation as soon as the law is<br />
implemented (likely start in 2011 based on Sep-10<br />
CPI y/y) if there is no explicit reference to RPI (or LPI<br />
linkage) in the trust deed which is not thought to be<br />
the average case. Active members’ liabilities are<br />
linked to salaries, which are typically modelled as<br />
RPI + x% and the proposed legislation does not<br />
change this unless there is a consensual move to<br />
CPI + y% (which may introduce basis risk). At<br />
retirement or deferment, PFs are treated as<br />
described above. We do not purport to provide a<br />
complete overview of pension fund legislation<br />
changes here and would suggest affected<br />
counterparties consult professional legal and pension<br />
fund advice. In this context, we have used a report<br />
titled ‘Red Views – Changes to Pension Indexation’<br />
by Reddington (Consultants) as an information<br />
source.<br />
As of end June-10, aggregate Private PF assets<br />
totalled GBP 901bn vs. liabilities of GBP 923bn,<br />
leaving PF in an aggregate deficit of GBP 21.8bn<br />
based on PPF7800 data – Chart 1. The PPF’s Purple<br />
Book 2009 found the aggregate funding position<br />
would deteriorate by 0.9-1% for each 0.1% rise in<br />
inflation – See Table 1. The RPI/CPI spread is<br />
volatile and very cyclical due to the housing<br />
components, specifically MIPS and Housing<br />
depreciation (Chart 3), whilst RPI’s arithmetic<br />
0<br />
Herve Cros/Shahid Ladha 16 July 2010<br />
<strong>Market</strong> Mover, Non-Objective Research Section<br />
40<br />
www.Global<strong>Market</strong>s.bnpparibas.com