broschuere ee zahlen en bf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Costs FoR eLeCtRiCity ConsUmeRs 38 Renewable Energy Sources in Figures Support under the Renewable Energy Sources Act, and cost apportionment to electricity price At present, electricity generated from renewable sources in Germany and paid for under the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG) is still, on average, more expensive than electricity from fossil or nuclear sources 1) . This gives rise to assistance costs which are passed onto electricity customers as part of the electricity price by means of an EEG apportionment. Nearly 600 particularly electricity-intensive companies in the manufacturing industry and railways profit from the special compensation provision in the EEG, being largely exempted from this apportionment [123]. As a result, the EEG costs paid by all other electricity customers are currently 20 % higher. How is the EEG apportionment calculated? Since 2010 the apportionment procedure for EEG costs has been set out in detail in the Renewable Energy Sources Act and related ordinances – especially the Compensating Mechanism Ordinance (Ausgleichmechanismus-Verordnung – AusglMechV). Under these provisions, the four transmission grid operators no longer distribute the electricity paid for under the Renewable Energy Sources Act to all electricity suppliers on a quota basis, but market it directly via the electricity exchange. The expected difference between the proceeds of sale on the electricity exchange and the costs of the payments to operators of EEG installations and the costs of marketing the EEG electricity is distributed pro rata over the entire final EEG power consumption by means of the EEG apportionment. This increases the suppliers’ electricity procurement costs. Under the Compensating Mechanism Ordinance, the transmission grid operators have to submit an estimate of the expected EEG cost differential by 15 October for the coming year and publish the resulting nationwide EEG apportionment. The latter then applies to the entire following year. Any surplus or deficit on the EEG account as a result of market trends deviating from the forecast must then be adjusted in the year after that. Further information on this point and on the previously valid procedure for the physical roll-out of EEG electricity can be found in [132], for example. EEG apportionment in 2010 On 15 October 2009 the transmission grid operators had estimated total expenditure of 12.7 billion EUR for 2010. The corresponding income was expected to be 4.5 billion EUR. Thus the difference of approx. 8.2 billion EUR was to be met in 2010 via the EEG apportionment, resulting in an EEG apportionment of 2.05 cents per kilowatt-hour for 2010 [124]. nominal data, after deduction of avoided grid charges. in view of the change in the calculation method, the figures for 2010 are not directly comparable to those for previous years. source: ifne [7] 1) one reason for this is the fact that this business calculation fails to take account of various items on the benefit side. a macroeconomic view could result in a different picture, see page 50ff. ÜnB [124] and BmU [53]. Development of EEG cost differential for non-privileged electricity customers EEG cost differential Year [bn. Euro] 2000 0.9 2001 1.1 2002 1.7 2003 1.8 2004 2.4 2005 2.8 2006 3.3 2007 4.3 2008 4.7 2009 5.3 2010 9.4
In retrospect, important assumptions made in this estimate for 2010 proved to be incorrect. On the one hand the net increase in the number of photovoltaic installations and the development of the payments for biomass were underestimated. This resulted in higher costs for the transmission grid operators in 2010. On the other hand, the proceeds of sale for EEG electricity fell short of expectations because of low price levels on the electricity exchange. In view of this situation, the transmission grid operators’ EEG account showed a deficit of over 1 billion EUR at the end of October 2010, which was taken into account when calculating the EEG apportionment for 2011. The final EEG accounts presented in July 2011 confirm the provisional estimates. They showed that the precisely calculated EEG cost differential for 2010 came to around 9.4 billion EUR. In purely mathematical terms this results in an EEG apportionment of about 2.3 cents per kilowatt-hour for 2010. Cost components for one kilowatt-hour of electricity for household customers [Cent/kWh] 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0 14.3 2000 16.1 Generation, transportation, distribution CHP act 17.2 18.6 19.4 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20.7 21.6 23.2 Costs FoR eLeCtRiCity ConsUmeRs 24.0 turnover tax electricity tax Concession levy eeG CHP act Generation, transportation, distribution 2000 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 8.6 9.7 10.2 11.2 11.8 12.2 13.0 14.2 13.9 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 eeG 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.3 2.3 1) Concession levy 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 electricity tax 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 turnover tax 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.7 3.3 3.4 3.7 3.8 Total 14.3 16.1 17.2 18.6 19.4 20.7 21.6 23.2 24.0 1) computed value on the basis of final eeG account for 2010 sources: BmU [50]; ifne [7] Renewable Energy Sources in Figures 39
Page 1 and 2: Renewable Energy Sources in Figures
Page 3 and 4: ContEntS Foreword 5 pArt i: GErmAnY
Page 5 and 6: ForEWorD Dear Readers, The consiste
Page 7 and 8: WorKinG GroUp on rEnEWABLE EnErGiES
Page 9 and 10: Expansion of power grids In future
Page 11 and 12: Renewable energy share increases de
Page 13 and 14: Renewable energy shares of energy s
Page 15 and 16: Structure of renewables-based energ
Page 17 and 18: Development of electricity generati
Page 19 and 20: Shares of total renewables-based in
Page 21 and 22: Development of heat supply from ren
Page 23 and 24: Development of renewables-based fue
Page 25 and 26: In the case of electricity and heat
Page 27 and 28: Emission balance of renewables-base
Page 29 and 30: Emission balance for renewables-bas
Page 31 and 32: Emission balance for renewable-base
Page 33 and 34: The tables show details of the savi
Page 35 and 36: Trends in investments in renewable
Page 37: Initial and further training in the
Page 41 and 42: [tWh] electricity feed-in/eeg Struc
Page 43 and 44: ards of the Energy Saving Ordinance
Page 45 and 46: Assistance funding and resulting in
Page 47 and 48: Environmental damage from emission
Page 49 and 50: Some of the costs and benefits of r
Page 51 and 52: Promotion of research and developme
Page 53 and 54: potentIal capacItIes Long-term sust
Page 55 and 56: Structural challenges: Expansion of
Page 57 and 58: PART II: RENEWABLE ENERGIES IN THE
Page 59 and 60: The National Renewable Energy Actio
Page 61 and 62: Structure of total renewable energy
Page 63 and 64: Structure of final energy consumpti
Page 65 and 66: A competitive, sustainable and secu
Page 67 and 68: Development of the share of renewab
Page 69 and 70: Renewables-based electricity supply
Page 71 and 72: Wind energy use in the EU Installed
Page 73 and 74: At the end of 2010, total wind ener
Page 75 and 76: equivalent to an additional collect
Page 77 and 78: In 2009 Observ’ER [101] puts the
Page 79 and 80: Jobs in the renewable energies sect
Page 81 and 82: The examples of wind energy and pho
Page 83 and 84: Development of world population and
Page 85 and 86: Renewables-based energy production
Page 87 and 88: Renewables-based shares of energy d
Page 89 and 90:
2009 Rural areas Persons using trad
Page 91 and 92:
In 2008, the renewables share of el
Page 93 and 94:
Renewable Energy Policy Network for
Page 95 and 96:
Clean Energy Ministerial - CEM - Th
Page 97 and 98:
1. Energy supply from photovoltaic
Page 99 and 100:
The emission factors for fossil and
Page 101 and 102:
5. Calculating avoidance factors an
Page 103 and 104:
The gross saving in fossil fuels is
Page 105 and 106:
8. Organisation for Economic Cooper
Page 107 and 108:
Conversion factors Terawatt hour: 1
Page 109 and 110:
List of Sources Communications from
Page 111 and 112:
[38] Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- u
Page 113 and 114:
[92] Umweltbundesamt (UBA): Zentral
Page 115 and 116:
[135] Sensfuß, F.: Analysen zum Me
show all

broschuere ee zahlen en bf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?