17.11.2012 Views

4 from ritual to theater and back: the efficacy ... - AAAARG.ORG

4 from ritual to theater and back: the efficacy ... - AAAARG.ORG

4 from ritual to theater and back: the efficacy ... - AAAARG.ORG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

212<br />

selective inattention<br />

under Nixon. O<strong>the</strong>r items added <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> crisis: <strong>the</strong> disagreement<br />

between Ford <strong>and</strong> Vice President Nelson Rockefeller over aid <strong>to</strong> New<br />

York City, <strong>the</strong> growing feeling nationally that Ford was stupid <strong>and</strong><br />

indecisive; <strong>and</strong>, perhaps (though <strong>the</strong>re is no direct evidence), Ford’s<br />

feeling that he was not <strong>the</strong> master of his own administration. The<br />

redressive action, as described in <strong>the</strong> New York Times of Monday,<br />

November 3, 1975 was typically dramatic:<br />

President Ford has dismissed Secretary of Defense James R. Schlesinger<br />

<strong>and</strong> William E. Colby, Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Central Intelligence, in a major<br />

shuffling of his <strong>to</strong>p national security posts. Administration officials<br />

said that <strong>the</strong> President had also asked Secretary of State Henry A.<br />

Kissinger <strong>to</strong> relinquish his post as national security adviser in <strong>the</strong><br />

White House, but <strong>to</strong> stay on as head of <strong>the</strong> State Department. White<br />

House officials said that Mr. Schlesinger would probably be replaced<br />

by <strong>the</strong> White House chief of staff, Donald H. Rumsfeld, <strong>and</strong> that Mr.<br />

Colby’s likely successor would be George Bush, <strong>the</strong> present head of<br />

<strong>the</strong> American liaison office in China.<br />

This redressive action did not end <strong>the</strong> crisis, but led <strong>to</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r surprising<br />

developments – as is often <strong>the</strong> case (“one thing leads <strong>to</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r”).<br />

Rockefeller <strong>to</strong>ld Ford that he would not in any case be a c<strong>and</strong>idate for<br />

<strong>the</strong> vice presidency in 1976. And, in <strong>the</strong> Washing<strong>to</strong>n scheme of things,<br />

this apparent resignation by <strong>the</strong> Vice President was probably a firing by<br />

<strong>the</strong> President – <strong>the</strong> reversal of roles being a common face-saving device<br />

in American politics. Or it might have meant that Rockefeller would<br />

actively campaign against Ford for <strong>the</strong> Republican nomination. Finally,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Secretary of Commerce resigned <strong>and</strong> was replaced by <strong>the</strong> one person<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Nixon administration whose reputation was not only<br />

untarnished but enhanced: Elliott Richardson, <strong>the</strong> man who – when his<br />

Watergate prosecu<strong>to</strong>r, Archibald Cox, was fired – resigned as At<strong>to</strong>rney<br />

General. The reintegration phase of this social drama <strong>to</strong>ok some<br />

time, as Ford established “his own” government in preparation for <strong>the</strong><br />

1976 elections.<br />

The characteristic structure of this Turnerian four-phase operation is<br />

that <strong>the</strong> breach exists for a long time, <strong>the</strong> critical corrective action is<br />

sudden, even unpredictable because a precipitating event is often not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!