17.11.2012 Views

4 from ritual to theater and back: the efficacy ... - AAAARG.ORG

4 from ritual to theater and back: the efficacy ... - AAAARG.ORG

4 from ritual to theater and back: the efficacy ... - AAAARG.ORG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

286<br />

ethology <strong>and</strong> <strong><strong>the</strong>ater</strong><br />

suddenly removed. The sound of laughter is triumphantly,<br />

celebra<strong>to</strong>rily, aggressive.<br />

All human <strong><strong>the</strong>ater</strong> is created by processes analogous <strong>to</strong> dream-work/<br />

joke-work. Dream-work/joke-work, in turn, are versions of redirected<br />

activities <strong>and</strong> displacement. Thus human <strong><strong>the</strong>ater</strong> arises precisely where<br />

animal <strong>ritual</strong>s do <strong>and</strong> serve analogous needs. These performances are<br />

liminal events existing <strong>to</strong> mediate or explore for pleasure interactions that are<br />

potentially risky <strong>and</strong> disruptive. Where transitions/transformations are dangerous<br />

what Van Gennep calls “rites of passage” are invented; where<br />

trouble is liable <strong>to</strong> break out, <strong>the</strong>atrical fun eases <strong>the</strong> way.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Scientists have long been prejudiced in favor of ma<strong>the</strong>matical <strong>and</strong> verbal<br />

languages. But semiotics reveals many different kinds of language –<br />

kinesic, visual, spatial, sonic, etc. Symbol-making often involves<br />

transformation of <strong>the</strong> body, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> spaces around it, in<strong>to</strong> full fields of<br />

communication. And transformation, not conflict, is <strong>the</strong> root of <strong><strong>the</strong>ater</strong>.<br />

When Mike displayed with <strong>the</strong> kerosene cans he was transforming<br />

<strong>the</strong>m. When Robert de Niro plays Jake La Motta in Raging Bull he is<br />

transforming himself.<br />

Many animals, including humans, employ disguises; prepare special<br />

places for habitation, mating, <strong>and</strong> <strong>ritual</strong> combat; drum, dance, <strong>and</strong><br />

sing; display spectacular manes, plumages, antlers, etc. Some, like fiddler<br />

crabs, even appropriate o<strong>the</strong>r animals’ bodies. Humans imitate<br />

whatever <strong>the</strong>y see: a shaman puts on a bear’s skin, a woman wears a hat<br />

with fea<strong>the</strong>rs, a singer whistles like a bird. Non-human animals can’t<br />

imitate so freely. Although a few species specialize in “deceit,” most<br />

animal performances are au<strong>to</strong>matically released, fixed, <strong>and</strong> stereotyped.<br />

There is no irony, no pliable <strong>back</strong>-<strong>and</strong>-forth play between <strong>the</strong> role <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> performer, no trilogical interaction linking performer <strong>to</strong> performer<br />

<strong>to</strong> specta<strong>to</strong>r. Even among non-human primates <strong>and</strong> dolphins – <strong>the</strong><br />

most intelligent <strong>and</strong> playful of animals – performances lack <strong>the</strong> kind of<br />

intricate mimetic fantasy-loving free-play we expect <strong>from</strong> our own<br />

species. And in all animal performances <strong>to</strong> lose is <strong>to</strong> lose, while among<br />

humans <strong>to</strong> lose is often <strong>to</strong> win: <strong>the</strong>atrical careers are built by <strong>the</strong> skill<br />

with which roles are played, not by <strong>the</strong> events of <strong>the</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ry. No one

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!