17.11.2012 Views

4 from ritual to theater and back: the efficacy ... - AAAARG.ORG

4 from ritual to theater and back: the efficacy ... - AAAARG.ORG

4 from ritual to theater and back: the efficacy ... - AAAARG.ORG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

230<br />

selective inattention<br />

<strong><strong>the</strong>ater</strong>, at least, <strong>the</strong>se disruptions <strong>and</strong> disturbances, <strong>the</strong>se variations –<br />

often brought on by unpredictable interactions with specta<strong>to</strong>rs – are<br />

what make this or that particular performance interesting. The process<br />

by means of which a performance grows over a period of time is<br />

analogous <strong>to</strong> evolution by natural selection working <strong>from</strong> accidental<br />

genetic variations. Ehrenzweig recognizes <strong>the</strong>se changes:<br />

A performer may readily change <strong>the</strong> inarticulate micro-elements of his<br />

interpretation <strong>from</strong> performance <strong>to</strong> performance. But this instability<br />

does not make <strong>the</strong>m arbitrary. Any change forces <strong>the</strong> performer <strong>to</strong><br />

recast his interpretation of <strong>the</strong> whole work on <strong>the</strong> spur of <strong>the</strong> moment.<br />

This <strong>to</strong>tal integration can only be controlled by <strong>the</strong> empty stare of<br />

unconscious scanning which alone is capable of overcoming <strong>the</strong><br />

fragmentation in art’s surface structure.<br />

(Ehrenzweig 1970: 49)<br />

Audiences as well as performers employ unconscious scanning. More<br />

than in “product arts” (painting, sculpting, writing, film) “process<br />

arts” (live performing) are co-created by performers <strong>and</strong> specta<strong>to</strong>rs. A<br />

reader may complete a written text in each reading, but only during<br />

live performances do artists <strong>and</strong> audiences co-create <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r in exactly <strong>the</strong><br />

same time/space.<br />

This relaxed unconscious scanning – selective inattention – is<br />

nowhere more clearly seen than in observing people at a performance<br />

of noh. Noh is <strong>the</strong> exquisitely articulated masked <strong><strong>the</strong>ater</strong> of Japan that<br />

“developed <strong>from</strong> a variety of sacred <strong>ritual</strong>s <strong>and</strong> festival entertainment<br />

arts . . . brought <strong>to</strong> a state of refinement <strong>and</strong> maturity during <strong>the</strong><br />

Muromachi period (1336–1568)” (Komparu 1983: xv). The Japanese<br />

say that <strong>the</strong> proper way <strong>to</strong> “watch” noh is in a hypnagogic state<br />

between waking <strong>and</strong> sleeping. Among <strong>the</strong> noh audience are many<br />

whose eyes are closed, or heavy-lidded. These experts are “paying<br />

attention” by relaxing <strong>the</strong>ir consciousness, allowing material <strong>to</strong> stream<br />

upward <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir unconscious <strong>to</strong> meet <strong>the</strong> sounds/images streaming<br />

outward <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> noh stage. In this state of porous receptive inattention<br />

each individual specta<strong>to</strong>r is carried along in noh’s dreamlike<br />

rhythms. Often images <strong>and</strong> sounds are shared by shite (leading ac<strong>to</strong>r),<br />

chorus, musicians, <strong>and</strong> specta<strong>to</strong>rs so that <strong>the</strong> principal character is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!