17.11.2012 Views

4 from ritual to theater and back: the efficacy ... - AAAARG.ORG

4 from ritual to theater and back: the efficacy ... - AAAARG.ORG

4 from ritual to theater and back: the efficacy ... - AAAARG.ORG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

284<br />

ethology <strong>and</strong> <strong><strong>the</strong>ater</strong><br />

hide, kill. Rituals are biologically necessary because conspecifics need<br />

<strong>to</strong> mate, organize in stable social hierarchies, share terri<strong>to</strong>ry. Interactions<br />

determining how <strong>the</strong>se are <strong>to</strong> be achieved are likely <strong>to</strong> cause<br />

trouble. Rituals mediate <strong>the</strong>se difficult interactions by creating a<br />

second reality more compelling than direct action. This second reality<br />

is performance.<br />

These performances are just as aggressive as direct action but less<br />

deadly. Among animals, in fact, two separate kinds of aggression<br />

operate: that directed against prey is unemotional <strong>and</strong> deadly, while<br />

that directed against conspecifics is emotional but <strong>ritual</strong>ized. Eibl-<br />

Eibesfeldt reports:<br />

An oryz antelope will never use its horns <strong>to</strong> gore ano<strong>the</strong>r oryz but<br />

fights according <strong>to</strong> strictly observed rules. It does, however, stab lions<br />

[with its horns]. A giraffe uses its short horns <strong>to</strong> fight rivals [o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

giraffes], but uses its hoofs in defense against preda<strong>to</strong>rs. A preda<strong>to</strong>r<br />

fights differently with a species member than with a prey <strong>and</strong> by electrical<br />

brain stimulation it could be shown in cats that <strong>the</strong>se two types<br />

of behavior have different neural substrates in <strong>the</strong> brain.<br />

(Eibl-Eibesfeldt 1970: 314)<br />

In humans, substitute in-group <strong>and</strong> out-group for “my species” <strong>and</strong><br />

“o<strong>the</strong>r species.” Many languages reflect this division by naming<br />

<strong>the</strong> home culture “human,” relegating all o<strong>the</strong>rs as non-human<br />

or barbarian.<br />

A stunning example of this is provided by Ruesch <strong>and</strong> Bateson. Just<br />

before Europeans arrived in numbers in Java a large white monkey was<br />

washed up on <strong>the</strong> coast. It was taken <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> court of <strong>the</strong> raja whose<br />

experts <strong>to</strong>ld him that <strong>the</strong> monkey was <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> court of <strong>the</strong> god of <strong>the</strong><br />

sea who had expelled him in anger by causing a great s<strong>to</strong>rm. The raja<br />

ordered that <strong>the</strong> white monkey be chained <strong>to</strong> a s<strong>to</strong>ne.<br />

Doc<strong>to</strong>r Stutterheim [Dutch government archeologist in Java] <strong>to</strong>ld me<br />

that he had seen <strong>the</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ne <strong>and</strong> that, roughly scratched on it in Latin,<br />

Dutch, <strong>and</strong> English were <strong>the</strong> name of a man <strong>and</strong> a statement of his<br />

shipwreck. Apparently this trilingual sailor never established verbal<br />

communication with his cap<strong>to</strong>rs. He was surely unaware of <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!