iaea human health series publications - SEDIM
iaea human health series publications - SEDIM
iaea human health series publications - SEDIM
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
REFERENCES[1] TABAR, L., et al., Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20 year follow up before and afterintroduction of screening, Lancet 361 (2003) 1405–1410.[2] WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention Vol. 7: Breast Cancer Screening,(INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER, Ed.), IARC Press, Lyon (2002).[3] PISANO, E.T., et al., Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening, New Engl. J.Med. 353 (2005) 1–11.[4] AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, Mammography Quality Control Manual, ACR, Reston, VA (1999).[5] EUREF, European Protocol for the Quality Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects of Mammography Screening,European Commission, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (2005).[6] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Control de Calidad en Mamograpfia, IAEA-TECDOC-1517, IAEA,Vienna (2006).[7] SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA DE FÍSICA MÉDICA-SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA DE PROTECCIÓN RADIOLÓGICA, ProtocoloEspañol de Control de Calidad en Radiodiagnóstico (Aspectos Técnicos). Edicomplet, 2nd edn, Madrid (2002).[8] EUROPEAN COMMISSION, European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Mammography Screening, 4th edn, Europeagainst Cancer, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2006).[9] McLEAN, I.D., HEGGIE, J.C.P., HERLEY, J., THOMSON, F.J., GREWAL, R.K., Interim recommendations for a digitalmammography quality assurance program, Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 30 (2007) 65–100.[10] YAFFE, M., MAWDSLEY, G., BLOOMQUIST, A., “A harmonized quality control program for digital mammography”, DigitalMammography, Springer, Berlin (2006) 585–592,http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11783237_79[11] SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA DE FÍSICA MÉDICA-SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA DE PROTECCIÓN RADIOLÓGICA, Protocolo decontrol de calidad en mamographia digital, SEPR, Madrid (2008).[12] NHS BREAST SCREENING PROGRAMME, Commissioning and routine testing of full field digital mammography systems,NHS Cancer Screening Programme Rep. NHSBSP Equipment report 0604, NHSBSP, Sheffield (2006).[13] NHS BREAST SCREENING PROGRAMME, Routine control tests for full field digital mammography systems, NationalBreast Screening Programme Rep. NHSBSP Equipment Report 0702, NHSBSP, Sheffield (2007),www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk[14] PEDERSEN, K., LANDMARK, I.D., Trial of a proposed protocol for constancy control of digital mammography systems, Med.Phys. 36 (2009) 5537–5546.[15] LEWIN, J.M., HENDRICK, R.E., D’ORSI, C.J., Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-filmmammography for cancer detection: Results of 4,945 paired examinations, Radiology 218 (2001) 873–880.[16] SKAANE, P., YOUNG, K., Population-based mammography screening: Comparison of screen-film and full-field digitalmammography with soft-copy reading: The Oslo I study, Radiology 229 (2003) 877–884.[17] PAQUELET, J.R., HENDRICK, R.E., Lesion size inaccuracies in digital mammography, Am. J. Roentgenol. 194 (2010)W115–118.[18] WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, Guidelines for Health Care Equipment Donations, Rep. WHO/ARA/97.3, WHO,Geneva (2000),http://www.who.int/hac/techguidance/pht/en/1_equipment%20donationbuletin82WHO.pdf[19] INTEGRATING THE HEALTHCARE ENTERPRISE (IHE), http://www.ihe.net[20] SKAANE, P., SKJENNALD, A., Population-based Mammography Screening: Comparison of Screen-Film and Full-FieldDigital Mammography with Soft-Copy Reading: Randomized Trial in a Population-based Screening Program — Oslo II StudyRadiology 232 (2004) 197–204.[21] SKAANE, P., YOUNG, K., SKJENNALD, A., Population-based Mammography Screening: Comparison of Screen-Film andFull-Field Digital Mammography with Soft-Copy Reading — Oslo I Study Radiology 229 (2003) 877–884.[22] DICOM STANDARD, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM),http://medical.nema.org[23] AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICISTS IN MEDICINE, An Exposure Indicator for Digital Radiography: Report ofAAPM Task Group 116, AAPM Rep. 116, New York (2009),http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_116.pdf[24] CRAWFORD, M.K., BRIXNER, L.H., Photostimulable phosphors for X-ray imaging: Applications and mechanism,J. Luminescence 48, 49 (1991) 37–42.[25] TAKAHASHI, K., MIYAHARA, J., SHIBAHARA, Y., Photostimulated luminescence (PSL) and color centers inBaFX:Eu2 + (X=Cl), J. Electrochem. Soc 132 (1985) 1492–1494.[26] ROWLANDS, J.A., The physics of computed radiography, Phys. Med. Biol. 47 (2002) R123–R165.[27] SAMEI, E., et al., Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems, Medical Physics 28 (2001) 361–371.[28] LEE, D.L., “Stability, dark current, noise, and performance optimization of selenium detectors”, Proceedings of SPIE(Proc. Conf. 2006), International Society for Optical Engineering, SPIE, Bellingham, WA (2006).149