iaea human health series publications - SEDIM

[29] ALSAGER, A., YOUNG, K.C., ODUKO, J.M., “Impact of Heel Effect and ROI Size on the Determination of Contrast-to-NoiseRatio for Digital Mammography Systems”, Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging, 6913, 69134I (Proc. Conf. 2008), SPIEPublications, Bellingham, WA, 1–11.[30] SAMEI, E., Technological and Psychophysical Considerations for Digital Mammographic Displays, RadioGraphics 25 (2005)491–501.[31] SAMEI, E., RANGER, N.T., DELONG, D.M., A comparative contrast-detail study of five medical displays, Med. Phys. 35(2008) 1358–1364.[32] CHAWLA, A.S., SAMEI, E., Ambient illumination revisited: A new adaptation-based approach for optimizing medical imagingreading environments, Med. Phys. 34 (2007) 81–90.[33] NISHIKAWA, R.M., et al., Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography, Radiology 2511 (2009) 41–49.[34] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Quality Assurance Programme for Screen Film Mammography, HumanHealth Series No. 2, IAEA, Vienna (2009),http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nahu/dmrp/publication.asp[35] ROYAL COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGISTS, IT Training, The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) Rep. BFCR(08)10, RCR,London (2008),http://www.rcr.ac.uk/docs/radiology/pdf/IT_guidance_trainingApr08.pdf[36] INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION, Medical electrical equipment. X ray tube assemblies formedical diagnosis — Characteristics of focal spots, IEC Rep. IEC 60336, IEC, Geneva (2005).[37] ROBSON, K.J., KOTRE, C.J., Pilot study into optimisation of viewing conditions for electronically displayed images, Radiat.Prot. Dosimetry 117 (2005) 298–303.[38] ROBSON, K.J., KOTRE, C.J., FAULKNER, K., An experimental investigation of the effect of light-box luminance on thedetection of low contrast objects in mammography, Br J. Radiol. 69 818 (1996) 153–159.[39] WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, Quality Assurance in Diagnostic Radiology, WHO, Geneva (1982).[40] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Applying Radiation Safety Standards in Diagnostic Radiology andInterventional Procedures Using X Rays, Safety Reports Series No. 39, IAEA, Vienna (2006).[41] BIRDWELL, R.L., BANDODKAR, P., IKEDA, D.M., Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a universityhospital setting, Radiology 236 2 (2005) 451–457.[42] GROMET, M., Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231, 221mammograms, Am. J. Roentgenol. 190 (2008) 854–859.[43] HELVIE, M.A., et al., Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancerdetection: pilot clinical trial, Radiology 231 (2004) 208–214.[44] CENTRE FOR EVIDENCE-BASED PURCHASING, Cost-effectiveness of full field digital mammography (FFDM) andcomputed radiography (CR) versus film/screening imaging for mammography: CEP 08015; NHS PASA 2008 [online] London(2008),http://www.pasa.nhs.uk/PASAWeb/NHSprocurement/CEP/CEPproducts.htm[45] VAN ONGEVAL, C., et al., “Classification of Artifacts in Clinical Digital Mammography”, Digital Mammography, SpringerBerlin/Heidelberg, (2008) 748–755,http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_103[46] JACOBS, J., ROGGE, F., KOTRE, J., MARCHAL, G., BOSMANS, H., Preliminary validation of a new variable pattern fordaily quality assurance of medical image display devices, Med. Phys. 34 (2007) 2744–2758.[47] JACOBS, J., et al., “One year of experience with remote quality assurance of digital mammography systems in the Flemishbreast cancer screening program”, Digital Mammography, (KRUPINSKI, E.A., Ed.), Springer, Heidelberg (2010) 703–710.[48] DANCE, D.R., SKINNER, C.L., YOUNG, K.C., BECKETT, J., KOTRE, C.J., Additional factors for the estimation of meanglandular breast dose using the UK mammographic dosimetry protocol, Phys. Med. Biol. 45 (2000) 3225–3240.[49] ALSAGER, A., YOUNG, K.C., ODUKO, J.M., Impact of Heel Effect and ROI Size on the Determination of Contrast-to-NoiseRatio for Digital Mammography Systems, Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging 6913, 69134I (2008) 1–11.[50] BOSMANS, H., et al., Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: An overview, Radiat. Prot.Dosimetry 117 (2005) 120–130.[51] CUNNINGHAM, I.A., FENSTER, A., A method for modulation transfer function determination from edge profiles withcorrection for finite-element differentiation, Med. Phys. 14 (1987) 533–537.[52] DOBBINS, J.T., III, Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra,and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems, Med. Phys. 22 (1995) 171–181.[53] FUJITA, H., DOI, K., GIGER, M.L., Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 6. MTFs of II-TV digitalimaging systems, Med. Phys. 12 (1985) 713–720.[54] FUJITA, H., et al., A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography, IEEE Trans MedImaging 11 (1992) 34–39.[55] INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION, Medical electrical equipment — Characteristics of digitalimaging devices. 1: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency, International Electrotechnical CommissionRep. 62220-1-2, IEC, Geneva (2007).150