iaea human health series publications - SEDIM

[56] CARTON, A.-K., et al., Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control, Med. Phys. 32 (2005)1684–1695.[57] MAIDMENT, A., ALBERT, M., Conditioning data for calculation of the modulation transfer function, Med. Phys. 30 (2003)248–252.[58] MARSHALL, N.W., Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system, Phys. Med. Biol. 51(2006) 5655–5673.[59] AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICISTS IN MEDICINE, Equipment requirements and quality control formammography, AAPM Rep. 29, New York (1990).[60] AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, Mammography quality control manual, American College of Radiology, Reston,VA (1999).[61] INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION, Evaluation and routine testing in medical imaging departments.Part 3-2: Acceptance testing — imaging performance of mammographic x-ray equipment, IEC Rep. 61223-3-2 Ed. 2.0, IEC,Geneva (2004).[62] WAGNER, L.K., ARCHER, B.R., CERRA, F., On the measurement of half-value layer in film-screen mammography, Med.Phys. 17 (1990) 989–997.[63] DANCE, D.R., Monte Carlo calculations of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose, Phys. Med.Biol. 35 (1990) 1211–1219.[64] WU, X., BARNES, G.T., TUCKER, D.M., Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography,Radiology 179 (1991) 143–148.[65] WU, X., GINGOLD, E.L., BARNES, G.T., TUCKER, D.M., Normalised average glandular tissue dose in molybdenum target— Rhodium filter and rhodium and rhodiuim-target rhodium filter mammography, Radiology 193 (1994) 83–89.[66] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology: An International Code of Practice,Technical Reports Series No. 457, IAEA, Vienna (2007).[67] DANCE, D.R., YOUNG, K.C., VAN ENGEN, R.E., Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the UnitedKingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols, Phys. Med. Biol. 54 (2009) 4361–4372.[68] INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIATION UNITS AND MEASUREMENTS, Patient Dosimetry for X Ray Used inMedical Imaging, ICRU Rep. 74, ICRU, Bethesda (2006).[69] XTHONA, A., Designing the Perfect Reading Room for Digital Mammography, a White Paper, (2010),www.medimaging.jp/whitepaper/796.pdf[70] POLLARD, B.J., et al., The influence of increased ambient lighting on mass detection in mammograms, Acad. Radiol. 16(2009) 299–304.[71] AAPM TASK GROUP 18 IMAGING INFORMATICS SUBCOMMITTEE, Assessment of Display Performance for MedicalImaging Systems, AAPM On-line Report 03, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park, MD (2005),http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/OR_03.pdf (supplemental files available at http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/OR_03_Supplemental/[72] FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGYAGENCY, INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANISATION, OECD NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY, PAN AMERICANHEALTH ORGANIZATION, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, International Basic Safety Standards for Protectionagainst Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources, Safety Series No. 115, IAEA, Vienna (1996).[73] INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION, Medical Electrical Equipment — Dosimeters with IonizationChambers and/or Semi-conductor Detectors as used in X-Ray Diagnostic Imaging, IEC-61674, IEC, Geneva (1997).[74] YOUNG, K.C., VAN ENGEN, R., BOSMANS, H., JACOBS, J., ZANCA, F., “Quality control in digital mammography”,Digital Mammography (BICK, U., DIEKMANN, F., Eds), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2010).151