The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8. ANNEX<br />
8.1. THE EQUIVALENT STATIC LOAD AND<br />
EQUIVALENT STATIC LOAD FACTOR<br />
8.1.1. Def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> ESL (Equivalent Static Load)<br />
and ESL factor<br />
<strong>The</strong> equivalent static load is a static load which can<br />
be taken <strong>in</strong>to account for the design <strong>of</strong> structures<br />
which are stressed by dynamic load<strong>in</strong>g. We only<br />
consider here concentrated loads (not distributed).<br />
<strong>The</strong> ESL is a static load with the same application<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t as the actual load, which would <strong>in</strong>duce <strong>in</strong> the<br />
structure the same maximum force (generally <strong>in</strong><br />
connection with the bend<strong>in</strong>g moment) as the dynamic<br />
load.<br />
ESL is not equal to the peak value <strong>of</strong> the dynamic<br />
load because <strong>in</strong>ertial forces (distributed along the<br />
structures) exist dur<strong>in</strong>g dynamic load<strong>in</strong>gs (Figure<br />
8.1).<br />
ESL can be lower, equal or higher than peak dynamic<br />
load, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the vibration frequencies (so<br />
called eigenfrequencies) <strong>of</strong> the structures to which the<br />
load is applied<br />
<strong>The</strong> dynamic load can be characterised by its PSD<br />
(power spectral density) which po<strong>in</strong>t out the range <strong>of</strong><br />
frequencies <strong>in</strong> which the load<strong>in</strong>g will have some true<br />
dynamic <strong>effects</strong>.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ESL factor is the ratio between ESL and the<br />
relative peak <strong>in</strong>stantaneous load (compared to its<br />
<strong>in</strong>itial value, if any). <strong>The</strong> ESL factor can change from<br />
location to another <strong>in</strong> a structure. For example on<br />
(Figure 8.1) ESL = 0 for two specific location <strong>in</strong> the<br />
112<br />
span and chang<strong>in</strong>g from 0 to approximately 1 for<br />
other positions. It could have been larger than 1 at<br />
mid-span if the frequency <strong>of</strong> load application would<br />
have been similar to the first or the third<br />
eigenfrequency <strong>of</strong> the beam. And it could also be<br />
smaller than one <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> non resonant effect, <strong>in</strong><br />
some particular location <strong>in</strong> the structure. In fact<br />
<strong>in</strong>ertial forces can have compensation effect or<br />
elim<strong>in</strong>ation effect, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the modal shape <strong>of</strong><br />
the structure, which can be very different from the<br />
static deformation shape. But these <strong>effects</strong> are<br />
difficult to be predicted and thus can be neglected <strong>in</strong> a<br />
simplified method. A simplified method will then be<br />
restricted to particular cases with special load<strong>in</strong>g. In<br />
other cases a dynamic simulation is then required.<br />
ESL factor can be estimated by analytical treatment<br />
<strong>of</strong> the load. Its value is determ<strong>in</strong>ed from the l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />
theory <strong>of</strong> the beam based on modal analysis which<br />
<strong>in</strong>cludes the modal shape <strong>of</strong> the structure. Due to the<br />
typical problems <strong>in</strong> substations and the necessary<br />
simplifications the formula limited to the first<br />
eigenmode only are used. Due to this simplification,<br />
the structural factor is equal to one, only the load<br />
factor has to be evaluated. <strong>The</strong> ESL factor is given by<br />
the folow<strong>in</strong>g equation :<br />
(8.1)<br />
ESL<br />
factor<br />
t ⎡ −ξ1ω1<br />
( t−τ<br />
)<br />
= ω<br />
− ⎤<br />
1 ⎢⎣ ∫ f ( τ).<br />
e . s<strong>in</strong>( ω1(<br />
t τ)).<br />
dτ<br />
0<br />
⎥⎦<br />
:where ξ is the modal damp<strong>in</strong>g, f(t) is the time<br />
function <strong>of</strong> the load, ω (rad/s) is the first<br />
eigenfrequency <strong>of</strong> the structure, t is time duration <strong>of</strong><br />
the load application.<br />
If the damp<strong>in</strong>g is assumed at 3% and if ESL factor is<br />
depend<strong>in</strong>g on the frequency <strong>of</strong> the structure (f<br />
=ω/2π ), the ESL factor will only depend <strong>of</strong> the load<br />
shape. For this reason, <strong>in</strong> chapter 3, we have splitted<br />
Figure 8.1 taken from "Earthquake response <strong>of</strong> structures", R.W. Clough, Berkeley, chapter 12. Influence <strong>of</strong> the dynamic load<strong>in</strong>g compared to<br />
static load<strong>in</strong>g. P(t) maximum is equal to P static.