24.11.2012 Views

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8. ANNEX<br />

8.1. THE EQUIVALENT STATIC LOAD AND<br />

EQUIVALENT STATIC LOAD FACTOR<br />

8.1.1. Def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> ESL (Equivalent Static Load)<br />

and ESL factor<br />

<strong>The</strong> equivalent static load is a static load which can<br />

be taken <strong>in</strong>to account for the design <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

which are stressed by dynamic load<strong>in</strong>g. We only<br />

consider here concentrated loads (not distributed).<br />

<strong>The</strong> ESL is a static load with the same application<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t as the actual load, which would <strong>in</strong>duce <strong>in</strong> the<br />

structure the same maximum force (generally <strong>in</strong><br />

connection with the bend<strong>in</strong>g moment) as the dynamic<br />

load.<br />

ESL is not equal to the peak value <strong>of</strong> the dynamic<br />

load because <strong>in</strong>ertial forces (distributed along the<br />

structures) exist dur<strong>in</strong>g dynamic load<strong>in</strong>gs (Figure<br />

8.1).<br />

ESL can be lower, equal or higher than peak dynamic<br />

load, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the vibration frequencies (so<br />

called eigenfrequencies) <strong>of</strong> the structures to which the<br />

load is applied<br />

<strong>The</strong> dynamic load can be characterised by its PSD<br />

(power spectral density) which po<strong>in</strong>t out the range <strong>of</strong><br />

frequencies <strong>in</strong> which the load<strong>in</strong>g will have some true<br />

dynamic <strong>effects</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ESL factor is the ratio between ESL and the<br />

relative peak <strong>in</strong>stantaneous load (compared to its<br />

<strong>in</strong>itial value, if any). <strong>The</strong> ESL factor can change from<br />

location to another <strong>in</strong> a structure. For example on<br />

(Figure 8.1) ESL = 0 for two specific location <strong>in</strong> the<br />

112<br />

span and chang<strong>in</strong>g from 0 to approximately 1 for<br />

other positions. It could have been larger than 1 at<br />

mid-span if the frequency <strong>of</strong> load application would<br />

have been similar to the first or the third<br />

eigenfrequency <strong>of</strong> the beam. And it could also be<br />

smaller than one <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> non resonant effect, <strong>in</strong><br />

some particular location <strong>in</strong> the structure. In fact<br />

<strong>in</strong>ertial forces can have compensation effect or<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>ation effect, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the modal shape <strong>of</strong><br />

the structure, which can be very different from the<br />

static deformation shape. But these <strong>effects</strong> are<br />

difficult to be predicted and thus can be neglected <strong>in</strong> a<br />

simplified method. A simplified method will then be<br />

restricted to particular cases with special load<strong>in</strong>g. In<br />

other cases a dynamic simulation is then required.<br />

ESL factor can be estimated by analytical treatment<br />

<strong>of</strong> the load. Its value is determ<strong>in</strong>ed from the l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> the beam based on modal analysis which<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes the modal shape <strong>of</strong> the structure. Due to the<br />

typical problems <strong>in</strong> substations and the necessary<br />

simplifications the formula limited to the first<br />

eigenmode only are used. Due to this simplification,<br />

the structural factor is equal to one, only the load<br />

factor has to be evaluated. <strong>The</strong> ESL factor is given by<br />

the folow<strong>in</strong>g equation :<br />

(8.1)<br />

ESL<br />

factor<br />

t ⎡ −ξ1ω1<br />

( t−τ<br />

)<br />

= ω<br />

− ⎤<br />

1 ⎢⎣ ∫ f ( τ).<br />

e . s<strong>in</strong>( ω1(<br />

t τ)).<br />

dτ<br />

0<br />

⎥⎦<br />

:where ξ is the modal damp<strong>in</strong>g, f(t) is the time<br />

function <strong>of</strong> the load, ω (rad/s) is the first<br />

eigenfrequency <strong>of</strong> the structure, t is time duration <strong>of</strong><br />

the load application.<br />

If the damp<strong>in</strong>g is assumed at 3% and if ESL factor is<br />

depend<strong>in</strong>g on the frequency <strong>of</strong> the structure (f<br />

=ω/2π ), the ESL factor will only depend <strong>of</strong> the load<br />

shape. For this reason, <strong>in</strong> chapter 3, we have splitted<br />

Figure 8.1 taken from "Earthquake response <strong>of</strong> structures", R.W. Clough, Berkeley, chapter 12. Influence <strong>of</strong> the dynamic load<strong>in</strong>g compared to<br />

static load<strong>in</strong>g. P(t) maximum is equal to P static.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!