The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 8.2<br />
What is ESL <strong>in</strong> this case :<br />
Assume that F(t) is the tension <strong>in</strong> the cable<br />
connect<strong>in</strong>g the equipment to another one or to another<br />
flexible connection. F(t) could result from the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>effects</strong> 1) from p<strong>in</strong>ch effect (if the<br />
connection is a bundle), 2) from sw<strong>in</strong>g out or fall<strong>in</strong>g<br />
down loads (horizontal connection between two<br />
equipment), 3) from dropper stretch (if the equipment<br />
is connected to another level with flexible<br />
connection).<br />
In the case shown, effect <strong>of</strong> F(t) and bend<strong>in</strong>g moment<br />
at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the equipment is completely<br />
different, it means that the <strong>in</strong>ertial forces have clearly<br />
some action. <strong>The</strong> design value is the maximum<br />
bend<strong>in</strong>g moment at the bottom. We could have had<br />
the same M max by apply<strong>in</strong>g ESL <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> F(t).at the<br />
top <strong>of</strong> the equipments.<br />
<strong>The</strong> situation could have been more complex if M max<br />
had not occurred at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the apparatus.<br />
How to apply the simplified method<br />
<strong>The</strong> problem is to def<strong>in</strong>e the cantilever strength<br />
needed for such equipment.<br />
Figure 8.3 Laborelec 150 kV test structure for two-phase fault (Belgium).<br />
We have extracted from CIGRE brochure N’105,<br />
second part, the case 5 tested <strong>in</strong> Belgium, for which<br />
we have access to both tension <strong>in</strong> the cable and<br />
114<br />
1) evaluate Ft, Ff and Fpi by IEC simplified method<br />
2) search first eigenfrequency <strong>of</strong> the equipment (if<br />
not known, use curve given <strong>in</strong> chapter 1),<br />
3) evaluate ESL us<strong>in</strong>g synthetic curve given <strong>in</strong><br />
chapter 3 (one curve for <strong>in</strong>terphase <strong>effects</strong>,<br />
another curve for p<strong>in</strong>ch effect), for example<br />
ESL1 = max(Ft-Fst, Ff-Fst) x ESL<br />
factor(<strong>in</strong>terphase effect) and ESL2 = (Fpi-Fst) x<br />
ESL factor (p<strong>in</strong>ch). <strong>The</strong>n consider max (ESL1,<br />
ESL2) = ESL<br />
4) In case <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial static load<strong>in</strong>g (Fst), just add Fst to<br />
ESL and compare total value to cantilever<br />
strength <strong>of</strong> the equipment.<br />
Remark : If you have access to advanced calculation<br />
method, you simply evaluate the dynamic response<br />
and locate maximum dynamic bend<strong>in</strong>g moment <strong>in</strong> the<br />
support, that bend<strong>in</strong>g is converted <strong>in</strong> equivalent top<br />
static load, which is compared to the cantilever<br />
break<strong>in</strong>g load. No need <strong>of</strong> ESL theory <strong>in</strong> that case.<br />
b) On support structures<br />
bend<strong>in</strong>g moment at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the support<br />
structures.