The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 5.11 Histogram <strong>of</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> the clearance time (TE)<br />
for phase to earth faults<br />
This parameter has a crucial <strong>in</strong>fluence on the<br />
amplitude <strong>of</strong> the <strong>mechanical</strong> loads. It is also worth<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g out that the longest clearance times occur<br />
with resistive faults, with the result that their<br />
amplitudes are lower. <strong>The</strong>se clearance times will<br />
depend on the coord<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> network protections,<br />
the location <strong>of</strong> the faults and their nature (s<strong>in</strong>gle or<br />
polyphase). For each fault p<strong>in</strong>po<strong>in</strong>ted, the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sequences may be considered:<br />
normal clearance time: ex t k =<br />
120 ms<br />
normal operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rate: 0.988<br />
In the event <strong>of</strong> a failure, the clearance sequences are<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten complex and the current <strong>in</strong>puts are not all cut<br />
<strong>of</strong>f simultaneously (see diagram below).<br />
I P − I L<br />
current <strong>in</strong>put<br />
O 220ms 700ms 1s<br />
Figure 5.12 Variation <strong>of</strong> SCC dur<strong>in</strong>g a fault<br />
<strong>in</strong> ms<br />
This raises the question <strong>of</strong> how the dynamic response<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>mechanical</strong> systems should be calculated for such<br />
clearance sequences. Several remarks are necessary:<br />
• First, regard<strong>in</strong>g the Laplace forces, the <strong>effects</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
which dim<strong>in</strong>ish very rapidly due to their quadratic<br />
dependence on the amplitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity.<br />
• Beyond a certa<strong>in</strong> duration (between 80 ms and<br />
200 ms), the loads on <strong>mechanical</strong> structures <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
83<br />
reach their maximum, and this is particularly true for<br />
rigid structures like tube busbars. For flexible<br />
structures, the response time may be longer.<br />
In light <strong>of</strong> the above remarks, it is <strong>of</strong>ten possible to<br />
chose an equivalent <strong>mechanical</strong> time. Simpler<br />
scenarios can then be considered, such as those<br />
proposed below:<br />
clearance time <strong>in</strong> the event <strong>of</strong><br />
failure <strong>of</strong> the protection<br />
systems:<br />
ex t k = 220 ms<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> failure per<br />
year: λ<br />
λ is the overall failure rate established <strong>in</strong> accordance<br />
with the low voltage devices <strong>of</strong> a bay. It is established<br />
on the basis <strong>of</strong> the failure rate <strong>of</strong> the protections<br />
compos<strong>in</strong>g the unit (e.g., for one protection per year:<br />
~10 -2 ).<br />
or:<br />
clearance time <strong>in</strong> the event <strong>of</strong><br />
failure <strong>of</strong> the <strong>circuit</strong> breaker:<br />
ex t k = 300 ms<br />
5.2.3.1.5. Reclosure<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> failure per<br />
year and per<br />
device:<br />
~2 10 -3<br />
Three parameters characterize a reclos<strong>in</strong>g cycle, t k1 / t i<br />
/ t k2. <strong>The</strong>re are two types <strong>of</strong> reclosure operation <strong>in</strong> the<br />
networks, the first described as rapid, after a few<br />
hundred ms (t i>100 ms) and the second as slow, after<br />
several seconds (t i>2s). <strong>The</strong>se reclosures may if the<br />
fault recur (~1 time out <strong>of</strong> 10), lead to f<strong>in</strong>al trips. A<br />
good knowledge <strong>of</strong> the ranges <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>of</strong> these<br />
parameters is important <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g the choice. If the<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> consideration is a type <strong>of</strong> substation<br />
frequently encountered <strong>in</strong> the network, a uniform<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> the isolat<strong>in</strong>g time may be taken. <strong>The</strong><br />
designer may have to choose carefully <strong>in</strong> order to<br />
make an accurate estimation <strong>of</strong> the distributions <strong>of</strong><br />
these parameters.<br />
5.2.3.1.6. Other Parameters<br />
If the risk situations are classified by probability <strong>of</strong><br />
occurrence, an ultimate load frequency approach then<br />
becomes possible. In that case, a rule can be set:<br />
• either regard<strong>in</strong>g the assumptions to be taken <strong>in</strong>to<br />
account.<br />
In this field, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the loads (w<strong>in</strong>d + <strong>short</strong><br />
<strong>circuit</strong>) may avoid arbitrarily choos<strong>in</strong>g an overly high<br />
or ill-suited safety factor based solely on the<br />
electrodynamic assumption.<br />
• or as to the maximum capability <strong>of</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
substations, acceptable <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> risk, and thus as to<br />
the conditions for rebuild<strong>in</strong>g or re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g an<br />
exist<strong>in</strong>g substation.