24.11.2012 Views

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 5.11 Histogram <strong>of</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> the clearance time (TE)<br />

for phase to earth faults<br />

This parameter has a crucial <strong>in</strong>fluence on the<br />

amplitude <strong>of</strong> the <strong>mechanical</strong> loads. It is also worth<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g out that the longest clearance times occur<br />

with resistive faults, with the result that their<br />

amplitudes are lower. <strong>The</strong>se clearance times will<br />

depend on the coord<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> network protections,<br />

the location <strong>of</strong> the faults and their nature (s<strong>in</strong>gle or<br />

polyphase). For each fault p<strong>in</strong>po<strong>in</strong>ted, the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sequences may be considered:<br />

normal clearance time: ex t k =<br />

120 ms<br />

normal operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rate: 0.988<br />

In the event <strong>of</strong> a failure, the clearance sequences are<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten complex and the current <strong>in</strong>puts are not all cut<br />

<strong>of</strong>f simultaneously (see diagram below).<br />

I P − I L<br />

current <strong>in</strong>put<br />

O 220ms 700ms 1s<br />

Figure 5.12 Variation <strong>of</strong> SCC dur<strong>in</strong>g a fault<br />

<strong>in</strong> ms<br />

This raises the question <strong>of</strong> how the dynamic response<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>mechanical</strong> systems should be calculated for such<br />

clearance sequences. Several remarks are necessary:<br />

• First, regard<strong>in</strong>g the Laplace forces, the <strong>effects</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

which dim<strong>in</strong>ish very rapidly due to their quadratic<br />

dependence on the amplitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity.<br />

• Beyond a certa<strong>in</strong> duration (between 80 ms and<br />

200 ms), the loads on <strong>mechanical</strong> structures <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

83<br />

reach their maximum, and this is particularly true for<br />

rigid structures like tube busbars. For flexible<br />

structures, the response time may be longer.<br />

In light <strong>of</strong> the above remarks, it is <strong>of</strong>ten possible to<br />

chose an equivalent <strong>mechanical</strong> time. Simpler<br />

scenarios can then be considered, such as those<br />

proposed below:<br />

clearance time <strong>in</strong> the event <strong>of</strong><br />

failure <strong>of</strong> the protection<br />

systems:<br />

ex t k = 220 ms<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> failure per<br />

year: λ<br />

λ is the overall failure rate established <strong>in</strong> accordance<br />

with the low voltage devices <strong>of</strong> a bay. It is established<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> the failure rate <strong>of</strong> the protections<br />

compos<strong>in</strong>g the unit (e.g., for one protection per year:<br />

~10 -2 ).<br />

or:<br />

clearance time <strong>in</strong> the event <strong>of</strong><br />

failure <strong>of</strong> the <strong>circuit</strong> breaker:<br />

ex t k = 300 ms<br />

5.2.3.1.5. Reclosure<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> failure per<br />

year and per<br />

device:<br />

~2 10 -3<br />

Three parameters characterize a reclos<strong>in</strong>g cycle, t k1 / t i<br />

/ t k2. <strong>The</strong>re are two types <strong>of</strong> reclosure operation <strong>in</strong> the<br />

networks, the first described as rapid, after a few<br />

hundred ms (t i>100 ms) and the second as slow, after<br />

several seconds (t i>2s). <strong>The</strong>se reclosures may if the<br />

fault recur (~1 time out <strong>of</strong> 10), lead to f<strong>in</strong>al trips. A<br />

good knowledge <strong>of</strong> the ranges <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>of</strong> these<br />

parameters is important <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g the choice. If the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> consideration is a type <strong>of</strong> substation<br />

frequently encountered <strong>in</strong> the network, a uniform<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> the isolat<strong>in</strong>g time may be taken. <strong>The</strong><br />

designer may have to choose carefully <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

make an accurate estimation <strong>of</strong> the distributions <strong>of</strong><br />

these parameters.<br />

5.2.3.1.6. Other Parameters<br />

If the risk situations are classified by probability <strong>of</strong><br />

occurrence, an ultimate load frequency approach then<br />

becomes possible. In that case, a rule can be set:<br />

• either regard<strong>in</strong>g the assumptions to be taken <strong>in</strong>to<br />

account.<br />

In this field, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the loads (w<strong>in</strong>d + <strong>short</strong><br />

<strong>circuit</strong>) may avoid arbitrarily choos<strong>in</strong>g an overly high<br />

or ill-suited safety factor based solely on the<br />

electrodynamic assumption.<br />

• or as to the maximum capability <strong>of</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

substations, acceptable <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> risk, and thus as to<br />

the conditions for rebuild<strong>in</strong>g or re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g substation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!