24.11.2012 Views

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Only the first eigenfrequencies can be compared<br />

<strong>in</strong> Figure 3.14, which shows an excellent<br />

conformity between the calculated and the<br />

measured values. <strong>The</strong> very good conformity <strong>of</strong><br />

the calculated spr<strong>in</strong>g constants and first<br />

eigenfreqencies with the measured values proves<br />

the validity <strong>of</strong> the FE model used for the<br />

simulation <strong>of</strong> the portals.<br />

Hence, all static and dynamic analyses can be<br />

performed on this model.<br />

Figure 3.14 Comparison <strong>of</strong> calculated and measured 1 st<br />

eigenfrequencies<br />

Experience has shown that, although the <strong>short</strong><strong>circuit</strong><br />

movements <strong>of</strong> stranded conductors seem<br />

to be chaotic, the relevant <strong>effects</strong> <strong>of</strong> symmetric<br />

arrangements and excitation are <strong>in</strong> fact also<br />

symmetrical. <strong>The</strong> measur<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts could,<br />

therefore, be arranged to a half <strong>of</strong> the plane <strong>of</strong><br />

symmetry as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.15 on crossarm,<br />

tower and bottom end <strong>of</strong> tower, i.e. <strong>in</strong>terface to<br />

foundation.<br />

In order to be able to validate and compare the<br />

measured, respectively calculated <strong>mechanical</strong><br />

stresses at the different po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> the structure as<br />

illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.15, the Equivalent Static<br />

Load ESL and the ESL-factors are <strong>in</strong>troduced.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>short</strong>-<strong>circuit</strong> forces Fpi, Ft and Ff<br />

conta<strong>in</strong> the static pre-load the ESL-factor is to be<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed as the quotient <strong>of</strong> the Equivalent Static<br />

Load divided by the <strong>short</strong>-<strong>circuit</strong> load <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the static pre-load.<br />

40<br />

Figure 3.15 Stra<strong>in</strong> gauge measur<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> the South portal<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce it is possible to separate the static pre-load and<br />

the dynamic part <strong>of</strong> Fpi, Fb Ff, one can, also def<strong>in</strong>e<br />

another type <strong>of</strong> ESL related to the dynamic portion<br />

alone. S<strong>in</strong>ce the static pre-Ioad is a particularly<br />

important parameter for the magnitude <strong>of</strong> Fpi, this<br />

other def<strong>in</strong>ition is more suited and practical for the<br />

dynamic portion <strong>of</strong> the sw<strong>in</strong>g-out and the conductorfall<br />

maximum. In the present context the <strong>in</strong>dex d -for<br />

dynamic -is employed <strong>in</strong> ESLd and ESLd Factor.<br />

<strong>The</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> the present tests does not<br />

explicitly dist<strong>in</strong>guish between sw<strong>in</strong>g-out and<br />

conductor-fall ESL, the relevant <strong>short</strong>-<strong>circuit</strong> test<br />

maxima be<strong>in</strong>g sw<strong>in</strong>g-out (Index t), and the<br />

conductor drop- p<strong>in</strong>g tests deliver<strong>in</strong>g ESLf anyway.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>gle conductors there is no p<strong>in</strong>ch<br />

effect, i.e. no Fpi.<br />

Figure 3.16 and Figure 3.17 display the comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> the measured and calculated relative static stra<strong>in</strong><br />

for the South/North portals and the Mid portal.<br />

Generally the comparison shows a very good<br />

agreement between calculated and measured values<br />

with the exception <strong>of</strong> one diagonal <strong>in</strong> the bottom<br />

girder <strong>of</strong> the crossarm, for which particular anomaly<br />

a reason is be<strong>in</strong>g looked for .<br />

Figure 3.16 Comparison calculated and measured relative static<br />

stra<strong>in</strong> South portal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!